Re: [OAUTH-WG] We appear to still be litigating OAuth, oops

[Neil Madden <[e-mail]>]

On 24 Feb 2021, at 11:39, Bron Gondwana <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> […]
> 
> Let's get down to use cases then, rather than talking in abstracts.
> 
> I'm an end user with a copy of {The Bat email client} and I want to connect it to {Gmail} + {Yahoo} + {My ISP}.  It supports {POP3}, a widely popular open standard.  I want to be able to authenticate to each of those services without saving my plaintext passwords on my hard disk where the next {Windows ME} virus will exfiltrate them to {Noextraditionistan} and all my {Dogecoin} will then be exfiltrated from my {Paybuddy} account, leaving me destitute.
> 
> But, {The Bat} doesn't have a trusted client cert from my isp, because who does - so there's no good protocol for me - it's either plaintext auth, or it's some architecture astronaut multi-party nonsense that's massively over specified and doesn't work half the time.  So I write a plain text password on a post-it note which is lying in the dust under my monitor because the glue has gone bad, and I hope I never accidentally click "remember me" when I type it in.
> 
> That's been the reality of the end user experience for very many years.
> 
> NxM means that you can authenticate an arbitrary client against an arbitrary server so long as they are both speaking a known public protocol, without needing to build a trust relationship between the client vendor and the server vendor first.

Does the following meet your needs?

You type your email address into {The Bat} to begin configuration. {The Bat} does discovery [1][2] to locate the OAuth/OIDC server for {My ISP}. The discovery document reveals that {My ISP} supports open dynamic client registration [3][4] so {The Bat} registers and gets issued with a client id and client secret. {The Bat} then does a normal OAuth flow to get an access token to access your emails from {My ISP}. If you later stop using {The Bat} you can go to your page on {My ISP} and revoke its access because it has a unique client id.

[1]: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html <https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html>
[2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8414 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8414> 
[3]: https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html <https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html>
[4]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591> 

> 
> Any "trust relationship" is made through a user both who trusts the client and trusts the server, and it's not transitive over to other users of the same client and the same server.  The client author doesn't need to get a signed "I trust you" from every single server, and the server author doesn't have to go identify every single client.
> 
> That's what NxM means to a user, the ability to use arbitrary clients with arbitrary servers so long as they both implement a documented protocol.  Interoperability.

That’s fine for your use-case, but that isn’t everybody’s use-case. Other use-cases (such as Open Banking) involve regulatory or policy frameworks in which open dynamic client registration is not appropriate. JMAP could have an RFC describing the use of OAuth with JMAP that mandates open dynamic client registration and discovery.


— Neil


-- 
ForgeRock values your Privacy <https://www.forgerock.com/your-privacy>