Re: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Tue, 08 November 2016 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7660129566; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:53:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sidn.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u12WVZXWKjjB; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E921293DF; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:53:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=yHHXJT/cU+oYvDOY6LVuEectAlB7utsoAgQ1BGmC0mA=; b=MYqtOkbjLd4acTJ451szQ76UFslCWBqm6YjSNYdLXUgpOA0AARV95ASUc3izBm38jrjP5JW+/x8zRBHjUQV3bEO6z0EX5fZbkPU+NS10cFIsXf07ZNjIBdMO1u2gs3/CT5A81xnM5agLuC+MdHyNgYagl9ZurNvam53XZmRoaDGDk7j9d5jV0MVf1F265q1quE99MY+7XRQhGN5YeOFMW+lz5W8WEIP/RZ7kWjq8CKP9334nVBF2lS1LyC9NEBjf9Akps+S/JWw1wxYZRWIjuYUHANwkZTp29BqD8R04yhGzSc73ZNZENElN6WhxQx6SWEY9nbTgh6PjwZj/axv1uA==
Received: from ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.179]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id uA8Jr27Z010133-uA8Jr27b010133 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:53:02 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx03.SIDN.local (192.168.2.179) by ka-mbx03.SIDN.local (192.168.2.179) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:53:02 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ([fe80::d130:f9c0:9810:3ea3]) by ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ([fe80::d130:f9c0:9810:3ea3%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:53:01 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
Thread-Index: AQHSOc8wnm2f48cYBku6LKTHPdBO2KDPWumAgAAUIYA=
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:53:01 +0000
Message-ID: <F9093CE9-985F-4A45-A0BC-A60732FC4E72@sidn.nl>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <6.2.5.6.2.20161108103525.0c84fd08@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20161108103525.0c84fd08@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.7.58]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F9093CE9985F4A45A0BCA60732FC4E72sidnnl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GVsz0QthO9vIHIJpIGBZNi4RWn0>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "shollenbeck@verisign.com" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "Livesay, Paul" <plivesay@verisign.com>, "draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay.all@ietf.org>, Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:53:26 -0000

Yes, this was addressed during the IESG review last december and resulted in the latest version. The only thing blocking is the IPR-disclosure

Gr,
Rik

On 8 Nov 2016, at 19:40, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com<mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com>> wrote:

Did the authors or Working Group address the second part of the DISCUSS?