Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDBE3A1A32 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:24:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-yX5Skhi9MC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9D63A1A30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:24:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:14e8:ea7d:a55b:34dd] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:14e8:ea7d:a55b:34dd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B848C2846CA; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:24:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <289B641E-F445-407F-9A7D-FCDEA9698F7C@akamai.com> <437bfe25-185c-4637-ae9a-59a6ccaade99@dogfood.fastmail.com> <BA07FAFAE7BBE5C47BCB7F58@PSB> <DM6PR02MB6924E8BF9FDCDABFE41D47A6C3BE9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <28656DF8FE9CF8FD65A91C6E@PSB> <00bd01d6f2a8$9d454b40$d7cfe1c0$@olddog.co.uk> <4de08e88-a1be-6a88-abea-3a78c1ae0f46@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <b7896a0c-0e84-c409-7de8-ea3e499260f2@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:24:05 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4de08e88-a1be-6a88-abea-3a78c1ae0f46@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GZYf_P0t6nv98cUfqRJ8GFQpTrg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:24:40 -0000

Hi, Michael,

On 25/1/21 16:06, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 1/24/2021 6:28 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> Can I just top-post to throw into the mix that one of the candidate
>> questionnaire questions is (quite reasonably) to you have support from 
>> your
>> employer (financial and time) to fill this role. Answering this 
>> question, of
>> course, means going to your employer and getting that support (or for
>> independents finding a sponsor). This represents a certain investment 
>> in of
>> reputation, may be a lot of work, and can be treated differently by
>> employers when a candidate is not selected.
> 
> One of the main drivers of our "diversity" problem is the input set of 
> people from which we draw our candidates - it lacks diversity on a 
> number of axes.  We've noted this before - that GIGO  or rather 
> Conformity In is Conformity Out.
> 
> I wanted to pull out this paragraph from Adrian's note and use it to 
> make a suggestion:   Let's have the last 5 or so Nomcom chairs plus 
> Andrew drag in the appropriate people from some of the larger companies 
> and ask them to help us with our candidate diversity problem. 

Wouldn't "drag in the appropriate people from some of the larger 
companies" actually be the wrong first step?

Those larger companies usually have the means for financial support, 
operating in a specific set of countries, and have a specific level of 
influence in the IETF. (many of these things are probably quite related 
with the diversity problem).

In that light, why not poll:
* folks from such large companies
* folks from universities
* independent consultants.

And for all of the above items, have folks from each of the different 
regions and, to the extent that's possible, from multiple genders.

(Still not perfect, but certainly a more diverse sample to tackle the 
problem of diversity -- otherwise it might result in micro-diversity)


> It may also make sense to see if they'd be interested in providing 
> funding for candidates not from those larger companies (e.g. smaller 
> sole consultancies, academia, non-profit research institutes) that may 
> not be able to find internal support for the large time commitments the 
> ADs especially have to make.    In academic terms - an endowed chair. 
> I'm not looking for them to fund their competitors obviously, but there 
> may be some benefit in providing support for someone nominally 
> independent of their company.

Wouldn't the Internet Society be an obvious fit for this one?

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492