Re: request to make the "tools version" of the agenda the default

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2012-11-30 20:16, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> John C Klensin <[e-mail]> writes:
>>
>>> I think changing the default is fine.  I'd also be reluctant to
>>> see the "normal" HTML version go away immediately but would be
>>> especially reluctant to see the plain text version go away or
>>> even become less accessible (require more clicks or searching to
>>> navigate too).
>>
>> I suspect we can all agree that this would be optimal:
>>
>> 1) have the tools version be the default (my original statement)
>> 2) have the html version still present
>> 3) have the text version still present
>> 4) produce an xml version for better parsing
>>    (ever try and write an agenda app? Half your time is spent writing a
>>    .txt or .html parser)
>
> s/xml/json/
>
> Ever try writing an XML app?  Half your time is spent writing a .xml parser.

Hahaha.

Best regards, Julian