Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> (Opportunistic Wireless Encryption) to Informational RFC

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 16 January 2017 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62471295A6; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:35:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gfl5-ocuwX1E; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F2E129587; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B1ABE5D; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:35:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bQ85g5r2DBKS; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:35:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B122DBE38; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:35:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1484584542; bh=q/unJXqiBTRWgf7NphGfRJ/7wiMWNk5nQbOG8m8OGpo=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=yvRQ5JAELcVM7KQ1gmsHe9bTYilil8hD8MATqcakjvjbxLXR78u3Zr9XzYn4xhcos tD8Ca0lzD31JMidandLcFyzX+oD9fHCgZ/SVEgeiwWQ0JcectvjkCprYdDfeRh53se f2XabyRb/Kv85Br7EDm4aAEPcBWPGHro9LEuGgWI=
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> (Opportunistic Wireless Encryption) to Informational RFC
To: draft-harkins-owe@ietf.org
References: <148095648466.3337.34445310856110357.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <1e5f314b-d253-04b3-8035-93c14c661437@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:35:40 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148095648466.3337.34445310856110357.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms060508020803080103030002"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Gtu7RoUOFjfXv77G-x4X0xcjqys>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:35:49 -0000

Hi Dan, Warren,

The (extended) last call for this is now over.

There were minor comments from the gen-art [1] and opsdir
reviews (not sent to a list?) and some additional editorial
comments received offlist (from IEEE folks I believe).

As promised, I also asked some IEEE folks about this and got
one substantive comment, which is below. (The author of that
didn't yet say yes when I asked if it was ok to forward their
email, so I'll post the comment itself and send a link to this
to the author, who can then decide to engage or not.) The
comment was:

"It's possible to do this via EAP, either as a new EAP method
implementing OWE or as an extension to EAP-TLS wherein client certs are
not required and a DH/DHE TLS ciphersuite is used. These approaches are
squarely within IETF's jurisdiction.  Why not go that route?  Indeed
there are a couple extra round trips required in the protocol, but you
don't commit any standardization cardinal sins along the way. "

I don't think any of the above are fatal to proceeding but would
like if Dan and/or Warren can respond to those comments and submit
a revised ID if one is needed. Assuming nothing major ensues as a
result I'll put this draft on an upcoming IESG telechat.

Cheers,
S.

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg100064.html

On 05/12/16 16:48, The IESG wrote:
> 
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Opportunistic Wireless Encryption'
>   <draft-harkins-owe-05.txt> as Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-01-13. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This memo specifies an extension to IEEE Std 802.11 to provide for
>    opportunistic (unauthenticated) encryption to the wireless media.
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harkins-owe/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harkins-owe/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>