IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Change in IPR policies

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 09 June 2020 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05DA3A09AF; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skuGqBf14CRL; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55CC3A08CA; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hQCt42zbzMjK; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:44:26 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1591742666; bh=+Dy8H9kHrcMqT0phgqsj1BJi8y1lrgV44/kUwhOves4=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=jG0eVkkR5RW5mI5kgwhGPQBBuhmBmHovQT3mCr3cQ3AIITBSx4fozdF7FUCkp3LW6 N0d9FoSTlWi+U3T4R7cEW++Zt09Kv51+01Z8aCOvE1huXUWBuI6HjibWiktCLdNDxQ 3XRzQsHbZeV6O6bVG8CW87BvTa1nePeupAs6CCGo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiZP23-8nLRj; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:44:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:44:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [193.111.228.74] (unknown [193.111.228.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 496066020D8A; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:44:24 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Change in IPR policies
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:44:07 -0400
Message-Id: <A2DDC480-2AC3-40A5-ADFF-91DEDFC80A83@nohats.ca>
References: <859539A9-ACD2-4E69-8657-7D4A7FE899B6@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, trustees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <859539A9-ACD2-4E69-8657-7D4A7FE899B6@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F75)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Gv9Hcx4SocNBPsDhIplKHz70wBQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:44:30 -0000


> On Jun 9, 2020, at 18:32, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Second, the consequence of getting it wrong could have been a large number of people abusing that and those who didn’t abuse it feeling very aggrieved at us for allowing that.

I doubt regular participants, a large number of them not paying for these fees personally, would choose to not pay AND participate, producing a log where their participation is recorded in jabber or live-streams yet they have no registration entry listed for them at the ietf108 meeting page.

For the record, I would not feel very aggrieved if this happened.

I would feel very aggrieved if this policy would cause even a few people with no funding to participate remotely.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email