Re: [IAB] IAB appeal for arpa assignment

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270323A0B92; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mc4Zng96k7Ku; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9D93A08BE; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw07.schlund.de ([10.72.72.53]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFe8h-1jzmYY3y9l-00EcWq; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 06:53:39 +0200
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:53:36 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <786445269.623526.1596516816575@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <yblzh7buj7e.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
References: <48148394.755622.1596165417606@email.ionos.com> <CANk3-ND=uJdr0hA017qGzRH8j15Ty5MEykkDddFTuqt6J2M4zQ@mail.gmail.com> <1328613138.1101416.1596513465285@email.ionos.com> <yblzh7buj7e.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Subject: Re: [IAB] IAB appeal for arpa assignment
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev32
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AzkZeT6cU+z812XKBf2RlYpZ4lxe9h7yrh1OaN4R6hI60muKl3D hbtx0HWBVS0pXkkVUmqLMyoepXPs2CH2GNTdr9ZEByq2Myw10qpcGFRWsyQE9DHktiEdrqp RIkh7q/NlvOwZgF3kVrNcjJHDYT3fmNQ1Q4WnjFs8mQK9D6kEhe/oLhIazPjX5r1oe4/WhT 88XeRs9HuqqSRLbK5/tJA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:5QbqZsCrTXU=:nHZKt8A3tUrilmMIww/PZs yGzjK8VmHGPVjQqaNEDYg7m1l17wZwkiLTGHEo0xH4CuWQL/H1PCqPOofcXXFUpfhLNDchh9C bMhSEJler60rjMgA4xanhhIibBjQK8BrwUrSnJ9S8tiV5Wl1KD5HAz0bv02lfEJz1BM/pSxGL REsrGoP+XL5TTbn7OhWZ57QHzaGhf/0btmnDumCpJRIdwk/breHckQQvKtA1uIQMY1+avqrF4 Vw68lmYPNmRtKb7uZTjKZ1hRoQFe3RhlWgt1a+Eyuj9/23fi7kaq6mnXjJ/b3n2oozIxRskAD vaizBaIM1VOI7rKo3+IQCbSmlfFr9kqQTXer2FufkuU0q7OYtE65nKpiLU7RmOUJEE/VAYr5L 4Eo09Q+u7AFY/Yu5Ayire70YKUd0smqbntSwKb7NLM1TP9x+RrpnwxEcy4Gh7vh1aYt0HNQ0/ M9C0fro16WMoUEcEKEkEd6RtM3TuD1O4Emo6y8K2BoLha4O+iF4O8O0S6ndf1ITJTbHSEHRaP TiZLr5zfWipiNoxOhonwVGJ6zNIe2n7HuRTWoybCQO/t0M5xzRu0LsK2X0GJGBXKA+xm4XOBO ezdXQO3s+3Zscl5pw5KBv1BPEzQjm0br+hBYElPK0OeBT+ZLNS8LA0VsUuP1RbJJ5giVg1uw+ ssKF0Dol1m8fYOo/M6yLi9gkNbo6FPjb/QYWohOWGaeE/I70hljpYipDnNK0Gt96duAywxBvQ 0JmTba7bjuFNcom1Dv8DRk8wsstWkvAYidzywX3knTSYVpDHEAqaPtVvRf36M+vMtKDzkB1Sb P+7Y+NpubUzyLq/TrqFrTVnyoJ9T8/oUdjV1nxb4kqdizE/fgw/FmQkvvf4R1N4OfJbIKQh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GvF5QJZHNIsEJjCsNa_Qe4uaEW4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 04:53:53 -0000

Ok thank you Wes. 

I know that the members of the IESG and the IAB are highly skilled seasoned professionals and in a group they are a formidable bunch.  I was wondering, what help is available to appellants like myself who are basically noobs to the entire process?  

Tim
On August 4, 2020 at 12:29 AM Wes Hardaker < wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:



Hi Timothy,

In the IESG appeal I listed every decision I could think of but this time I
would like to avoid that. There are some decisions that the IESG made that
I may be unaware of making it difficult for me to pick. Section 8 of RFC
2026 says"

Each of the organizations involved in the development and approval of
Internet Standards shall publicly announce, and shall maintain a
publicly accessible record of, every activity in which it engages, to
the extent that the activity represents the prosecution of any part
of the Internet Standards Process.

Can you please post the previous draft(s) of the final IESG decisions
and any other activity engaged in for that final decision of my appeal?
The IAB does not have access to "previous draft(s)" of documents
authored by the IESG. If they do exist, we wouldn't know about it or
have them unless they were provided to us [they weren't, as far as I
know].

[speaking for myself, not for the whole of the IAB] Although I'm the IAB
liason to the IESG, I am not a core member of the IESG and thus was not
privy to the conversations about your appeal to the IESG. Thus, I must
base any conclusions I have on your desire for an appeal to the IAB
based on the information I can gather, which would certainly include the
IESG's response regarding the appeal and, hopefully, your view of
where and why that response was incorrect.

--
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI