Re: feedback & blog entry
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 24 September 2013 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70D021F937E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeSy5yKTdceI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3744B11E8159 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f4so2854389oah.16 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=c1csJ/HkiYmST+DqYRXF3hPQ3ndrwxQl74GJyS0RCH0=; b=OCMBVqEdnevOAfaq5p57fYDKZpqpfIRcayjF3+P1AsQi+Ot13OYuOyHHfoA6jO7KM3 QsUXxugA6h+pNz6MQcW9Txnuqjd5xHoKohYvxSeM0/rxAf5KyYA3+Rx9ux/yuNvhojy1 ww49R9zIiCgebCzLyyFYVdf8OmR4xnsCaZkEheONTF7h1Wt5cx0qh8AYmakkidPSA0jB T57VYV33h8yd8vItAubT2ReyyfSEL5NmGJCbgAXsThn9JJLLjFrQXGhh7el+CklbKmYA iekTZhVXDkd0/uBef2tl+KDcXQNnVFCHwGMldZqMmjsuqQr5LoJFopiACnBUWGzxu5FW 2LbQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.96.131 with SMTP id ds3mr3134119oeb.50.1380055653657; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.30] (99-200-84-248.pools.spcsdns.net. [99.200.84.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm28718773oef.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5241FA62.50302@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:47:30 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: feedback & blog entry
References: <2722B4FA-425D-45D7-B307-91D808C49FB3@ietf.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130922084046.0c652ec0@resistor.net> <13FB566B-18C4-474C-BE65-D668399B9D10@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <13FB566B-18C4-474C-BE65-D668399B9D10@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000009010602080108070202"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:47:39 -0000
On 9/24/2013 1:22 PM, IETF Chair wrote: > SM: > > Thanks for the feedback. > >> I read the article. As a comment about the last paragraph, the metric being used is not the best in my humble opinion. > You are referring to attendance and authoring RFCs? I agree, of course. I apologize for using a metric that is, at best, partial. My only defense is that it was what I had easily available :-( I do realise that real engagement from different types of organisations and people and areas of the world goes to far more fundamental issues than showing numbers of people. True involvement and effect is what counts. As we know, that does not necessarily correlate with any particular statistic... > >> Spencer Dawkins made an insightful comment which I would look into if I was looking for a better metric. > Ok. Which comment are you referring to? I'm sorry, too much e-mail to know what you are referring to. I'd be interested in better metrics. Hi, Jari, I'm not saying that I make so many insightful comments that I can't keep them straight, but I wasn't sure, either :D I'm guessing SM is referring to this one ... https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k3=12404&k4=1&tid=1380055577 Spencer
- feedback & blog entry IETF Chair
- Re: feedback & blog entry todd
- Re: feedback & blog entry SM
- Re: feedback & blog entry IETF Chair
- Re: feedback & blog entry Spencer Dawkins
- Re: feedback & blog entry SM