Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br> Fri, 07 June 2013 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <juliao@braga.eti.br>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276021F9950 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7wRvw1USRX2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22f.google.com (mail-yh0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B89E21F9732 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f64so436765yha.20 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=sMk58xkPrSrVDnWmA9yzO0ezSoOqtEia/+9pSJ9B878=; b=hviCK2UIXzzeA8C7pqpnebxD5Y18OH/BWSKeKv9HJIBmcI/UEPXughIH3XF436+LfV 0Gpk7cMFAx1IcHriwMgFARXHPqqtm5YFBi2mhqGEMfCBWiQfZgl9EwNmMCA9mQ/24tZY gvS4i/yz56vqbX2CksJmY7Cce9m/OjwCSLt9d/a/6F9Jje/0kyFplKAxjgvsMnDsBzwD HXqhrbHAxcMQUNKtbvpafcTXne8jvCahiXCUCrjb0ABhJcBsrWRSrrbskDN50nmKY68O oD2jD/Gk30jILpuwbiHD9xz8qex0kv3JAYJR1TFk8XJZgheucA7dBDzb/8othjSbKM1H 7z/w==
X-Received: by 10.236.25.193 with SMTP id z41mr18458633yhz.22.1370629071195; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1294:1295:1295::167? ([2001:1294:1295:1295::167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w12sm120496093yhj.19.2013.06.07.11.17.48 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51B223C7.2010401@braga.eti.br>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:17:43 -0300
From: Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
References: <201306070453.r574r3Wt010088@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com> <CADnDZ89FjyPtvJQSqY+kmX+1KYkc0jo1mRpOgkfcEnTH6Vbg6A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA462@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <201306071449.r57EnN5N008971@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CABCOCHSkLj0409hyeqKNdomOdrScYypi_7a1xWqMEUV9eTPuCw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751CA801@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABCOCHR+5M06ToW4jLzALv+FuNHiVbytCGEgkQ3JvG4aUBty=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=bVC8ZQ6bZP7V2KWp2Lj3nt-Hd=0camBFqT=ThCKJwqGf0Zw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC8ZQ6bZP7V2KWp2Lj3nt-Hd=0camBFqT=ThCKJwqGf0Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3+TIraHZkxEn5DwB+GSGuAVVARQ+6XEW6Hy8Zvi6d2zxa83dVK0KCod8sk+yUeh07g35L
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:17:52 -0000

+1

Em 07/06/2013 15:09, Ulrich Herberg escreveu:
> I like the idea of a separate list for last calls. It would not solve
> the issue of noise for all of us (and not reduce the overall amount of
> emails), but it would separate general discussions from IETF LCs. I
> have IETF emails filtered by mailing list into different IMAP folders,
> and thus a separation could be useful for me.
> 
> Ulrich