Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 24 February 2015 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1495F1A903C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LrD3FHuJY11 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3D21A903A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pdjg10 with SMTP id g10so36471704pdj.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OMxMe0KwLPpAjI+nEYCTbVwt9UoEJZTp61uRWI0qXAM=; b=TvPrvVORfsxNVp2BAA/TeYIfwyIU2jvrzuzhOizotcsqOGYB9F5LlXxLKTvsYJXATm nUIZDRUUE7mUUs50gqvng56z2mNLzbLd2Nd7vDbh8PyZoo27Rs+PRm012/ulroN9g963 wOlX33V6eyNZ21Rv/TOvAyRRitOuMdDsjpp2a1jrc4KksmLg6aW7fn038dCKX1IB2Hd6 7iczFEfQUyVNidzoyj1lvbHWpyhESOiEXpn0Ycg+RIK9+8sA87N/fdcin5+Vf/KoH4GF 0Tmmt3Gl2eoe+hUBITw2/e0zQeJwSjKNwKTLtckF0+KQcuP2CZVIFuZTOANweALkJEqj aMfg==
X-Received: by 10.68.221.34 with SMTP id qb2mr7067209pbc.47.1424815009950; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (209-112-212-92-rb1.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.112.212.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kd6sm7171398pbb.40.2015.02.24.13.56.48 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54ECF39F.9060705@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:56:47 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [92all] IETF Hackathon at IETF 92, March 21-22, Dallas, TX
References: <20150224170152.6224.60832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DBC7E705-B163-46E8-AC9B-97BDC33E7C68@apple.com> <54ECBC5E.2030001@dcrocker.net> <CAHw9_iKpmEOFyZ5Mi=6KcsEoLHDVCwFTi5q_0GfK-d5B1X_Hdg@mail.gmail.com> <7E5194B1-4717-4225-85C6-E969EF7800A7@apple.com> <D1120FE3.3E483%eckelcu@cisco.com> <54ECDDA0.6010904@dcrocker.net> <8DB221D1-5AEC-4BB9-A44B-E326B9AE8FF4@juniper.net> <A9B04584-D55B-4249-BDBE-B3497321A886@nominum.com> <9A584215-74D0-4035-99EC-1F49B0C73F2C@lucidvision.com> <6AC7040D-77E6-4D59-89DD-82EE641220BF@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6AC7040D-77E6-4D59-89DD-82EE641220BF@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H9VxO3KjygW2C7uPgG2JNYte7H0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:56:52 -0000

On 2/24/15 12:29 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> This text, in an email from the IETF Secretariat, is immediately
> followed to a cisco.com URL.   So a disinterested reader would
> naturally assume that the event is an IETF event, and that Cisco is
> somehow involved in organizing it, or maybe is sponsoring it (e.g.,
> paying for the room or something).   I do not actually know the truth
> of the matter, but the meeting info is very clear about what the
> hackathon is about.   So while I guess I can understand that you
> might be confused about who is sponsoring it, I am still at a loss as
> to why that's a problem.

I don't love it - it increases the difficulty of arguing that yes,
the IETF really is a vendor-independent organization just a wee bit
more - but I wonder if Cisco would not choose to sponsor something
like that if they couldn't slap their branding on it.  Why was the
announcement on Cisco's site, anyway?  Is this a Cisco event or
an IETF event?

Melinda