Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17BB1A899C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:36:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zscEFELFUw6K for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10EEA1A8974 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:36:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 51636 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2014 16:36:23 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2014 16:36:23 -0000
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:36:04 -0000
Message-ID: <20141209163604.11502.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
In-Reply-To: <20141209050920.GJ11221@localhost>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HDC2gfcQ5aN_iRM40v_pB3mP_9s
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:36:40 -0000

>> To the best of my knowledge, there has _never_ been a
>> requirement that cited documents be available online, and
>> especially that authoritative copies be available online.
>
>But perhaps there should be one as to new RFCs.

That means nobody can cite a printed book, or an article from an ACM
or IEEE journal.  (To the extent the latter two are online, they're
PDFs behind a paywall.)

This seems to me to be making rules for the sake of making rules, not
because there is a problem that needs to be solved.

R's,
John