IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 10 March 2020 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CDF3A1366 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiZzTlGkxDbh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A91E3A1425 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39256176C07 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:00:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id BgNMjt2sRpoGlBgNMjCfWs; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:00:56 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Gb85YzfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=SS2py6AdgQ4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=6qe_SkfJAtWsTVREhjQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=5PjRKeHDAAAA:8 a=LpsivZoszp_XrCfoNfcA:9 a=eoDEe2cjlV1ZqNSt:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10:nop_html a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=JUmZIVAtDGArBY8dChIh:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UnFnR8dZy5JmhcHcAaueXPp99m3V3OZ9l9exPDPustU=; b=zgiZ/jPZo61Mr+VNUGNDaB3Ben 8STDnACfHjOOEa6Pbc9PlJUqT/tNGg62brDtovEK7F/95mXl/gCMD78mlX1/RazeJH28BDgu+M5qC /xbZbabWsGZJ33nR8iO3RxGK8;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=44367 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jBgNL-0045L3-Rw; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:00:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [107all] Update on IETF 107 Vancouver and COVID-19
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <158335136585.29295.1109218817393181187@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMG+OhM9_G3+ikfGxXSqi6PMO0EJeZ=vCC3Wne=YWHLLhg@mail.gmail.com> <653F4F12-E11B-4843-90AD-EBD35D19E21D@nohats.ca> <CAKKJt-dzUPvBAxo7RP_QCMwX=DgS2NJrzK1r9ucdjgUji8+nhw@mail.gmail.com> <c52ec6f1-dd2d-78a5-faa9-6a506a0f3da7@gmail.com> <14AF65D4-8ACA-42E0-97D2-29B1733D6113@consulintel.es> <7c0a3571-3334-2bc9-a8f9-a60131ce7e2e@meetecho.com> <FE0DB611-4915-413B-A9A1-5734CA273E89@consulintel.es> <CF8C876F-B494-42AB-AB6B-C6E022F2020E@consulintel.es> <8b392292-69b0-0de3-1605-2556cb0ce4e7@meetecho.com> <9477CB7B-D2ED-4F72-98BE-9C62E632FAF3@ericsson.com> <269634BE62939E4FDA7F81F9@PSB> <CAAuWHCJKnwk4gxjUMNvbM_5mh9OrUyMqc1MGRxKzNF3w3K+QSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAuWHCLrecE=TpfGv=hP41vVpFw+O2rY4iENTTwfjCs82BvCcQ@mail.gmail.com> <170c4391440.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <7EA9B301-D302-43E6-99D2-A6F89B245C27@cisco.com> <B6C182ED-89A8-40A9-BEB9-186EBA6BD898@strayalpha.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <6b91c609-96de-0ebd-9415-e7b77eab4e63@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:00:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B6C182ED-89A8-40A9-BEB9-186EBA6BD898@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2417201BD16BA486B996ABFB"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1jBgNL-0045L3-Rw
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:44367
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HOoC4H4F1oJSMl0o2mW_w9GiATA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:01:05 -0000

well with the likely number of attendees, it's likely it'll be possible 
to support the recommended 2M separation between chairs/attendees...

On 3/10/2020 10:57 AM, Joseph Touch wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 10, 2020, at 7:35 AM, Eliot Lear 
>> <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org 
>> <mailto:lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>
>> My favorite is this one:
>>
>>> Event activities 	Will participants be participating in activities 
>>> that promote transmission? 	Activities that could contribute to 
>>> spread: singing, cheering, close physical contact such as when 
>>> participating in contact sports, sharing food or beverages, etc. 
>>> High importance
>>>
>>
>>
>> One could envision some activities to avoid, such as the IETF Rugby 
>> League (Routing v. ART, Internet v. Security, and Transport v. 
>> General).  Losers must take Friday slots in Madrid.
>
> Some WGs are a contact sport…
>
> Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email