Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Fri, 26 February 2021 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA693A0C20; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:38:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ll3JUeLvSbiH; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDF8C3A0C1E; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b9:15ed:9bd5:c92f] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:b9:15ed:9bd5:c92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE98360004C; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:38:25 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1614328706; bh=/8D8/WdfzMyEBA+eo55cRQvPlFGq2cAfMJwOgrTIC2M=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=t+aKIL3vWjq/LGkHM1Q8Ci1rm08Ddrpng9xRzwFbsOZfaS5QC7WCMEbzoVmUOQIiu ndgDo4DHf6f+hEZ0hqYk8jLgQXZV4Im0A0wfGt2zeqXV9xjEn4vkJnOZZqbXNcrSXJ 38muAC65VS92HRQ3LR8uLkMbpoiH0KAhvbYN6/qY=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <1DAB9964-59A9-49A7-BF3A-201A0D7A56CE@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E06C2CD-0934-4C97-9FBD-7E4CC3747A5A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:38:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4fc62af0-cbf0-c923-5e24-fc0dfc1de996@si6networks.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <446A8D6B-E624-49E0-B67E-D1F8AFC794E2@lastpresslabel.com> <28ac1e86-f641-b9e8-0f61-6ff442feaa90@si6networks.com> <LO2P265MB057322BA95B1B44D4175356BC29E9@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <b24ce0e9-8912-12b1-af8a-6024ae83288f@si6networks.com> <25E1B1D5-E8F1-4053-A1E0-6B2948577E84@akamai.com> <3a8dca6d-0aca-d578-0f7a-3f68e2811bad@si6networks.com> <9FBF7792-8507-45F2-B06C-2173BCDF7D4C@akamai.com> <4fc62af0-cbf0-c923-5e24-fc0dfc1de996@si6networks.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: EE98360004C.A15CB
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HPUrqNE10BGU0squZ7pzdzUKxG0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:38:34 -0000

On 2021-2-25, at 22:09, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> When discussions end up spread over gihub and email lists, that's not a nice feature, IMO.

It is possible to configure GitHub so that issue discussion is reflected onto a mailing list, and email responses get reflected into the web issue system. QUIC uses the quic-issues@ mailing list for that. That mailing list is an IETF list, searchable and archived.

Thanks,
Lars