IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 July 2016 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B39128E19 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRa4Pul3c3O4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D8412D786 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F87A200A5; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:54:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B86F638D1; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
In-Reply-To: <14b99269-9999-dc44-c42c-87b228f4f92b@nostrum.com>
References: <20160718132715.24782.50243.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <14b99269-9999-dc44-c42c-87b228f4f92b@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:44:58 -0400
Message-ID: <12373.1469036698@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HYdVDZnaObYWdtY0f--htS77itA>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:45:01 -0000

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
    > One of the things that I find missing from this invitation is an
    > indication
    > of the level of commitment required to participate: how much time
    > investment

I had the same quesiton.

I won't be at more than 2/3 in-person meetings on average, and going to a
retreat is probably off the table too.

On the other hand, having people remote would be a good thing.

    > existing committees are quite homogeneous: unless I'm mistaken, all nine
    > Meetings Committee members are white males from the US or Western

I'm white mail north american too.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email