Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-gi t-using-github-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 00:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662AD3A0A13 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPJqgxS0AU8Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8173A0A0F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48dmYC621kz1p2SP; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1584058799; bh=EIaX0d8NzRzlCMFPI5kX+nZ+hzOmpz8/Hjc2BxObtfY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oe05+blBiaqb2gWLwvb3ID1QSoHZ9wM06Bg4HH+r3sQ0XBwPYosOSPwjp4Oki9rWX aYu0l7V7pyLJvx8wM2Tn+MbVlYbgZHgo+sTvsSvE8ufW46N3NDSbw0tnhzcYm0IwIr S8JemyBThXWvZacQHJnOKDCvCaNR5tlAY6NRi1Pg=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48dmY94tZVz1nsxD; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-gi t-using-github-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <158395281137.1671.933778421064897517@ietfa.amsl.com> <03958aff-0e58-1fc6-8d50-ca38f8221ce6@gmail.com> <CAMMESszjUH86oJaX9QH_tU58DZX9PhSHbmUq=4anE9-iRO0tNg@mail.gmail.com> <B806BAE2-4B47-4BEF-AA3D-169B6B4A978C@cooperw.in> <3B60E587-C8A5-4A2C-8D8F-33FAD96E21CE@cooperw.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20200312153217.0ee4e480@elandnews.com> <611a8e3b-6109-45ed-9212-7bbb848759de@www.fastmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200312164544.0e1a8898@elandnews.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <c4acfdcb-f8bb-2e66-d3d8-844f1d3107a6@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:19:54 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200312164544.0e1a8898@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H_rp9n1ixWSf6ViGkdFxMWP4wWc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:20:02 -0000
SM, I have trouble understanding the question you are asking. During and after the IETF LC, questions were asked about the document. Being proactive, the WG (authors and chairs) have been proactive in addressing the questions (many from the IESG). This seems to be not only appropriate, but highly desirable. Given that the WG has been copied on the emails about the topics and changes, if the WG objects they can speak up. What is it you are objecting to? Yours, Joel PS: While I have a lot of concerns about the push to use git / github, Martin and the WG have been very fair and effective about the process they are using, and it fits with IETF process. On 3/12/2020 7:53 PM, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Martin, > At 04:25 PM 12-03-2020, Martin Thomson wrote: >> This is patently false. The archives of the working group mailing >> list clearly show a lot of discussion. >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/ >> >> The pull requests are proposed resolutions to points raised in review, >> but the discussion about those changes is occurring on the mailing list. > > The archives of the working group mailing list shows that there was a > discussion during the IESG Evaluation. Is there a step between the end > of the Last Call and the IESG Evaluation where issues are identified? > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … S Moonesamy
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … S Moonesamy
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … S Moonesamy
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Ietf-and-github] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on … S Moonesamy