Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Joel Halpern <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > I really don't think that relaxing nomcom membership rules is an
    > effective way to address our (very real) leadership diversity
    > issue. That being said diversity is clearly of value for the nomcom
    > itself, in addition to the value for our leadership bodies.  I have no
    > idea whether the proposed rules would actually qualify a more diverse
    > set of people. Larger, yes.  More diverse?  Maybe.  But given that all
    > of these rules are very rough approximations for what we need, I am
    > concerned that relaxing them without sufficient relationship to our
    > needs has a too high a probability of making things worse in important
    > ways.

If we can find a way to get the registration database imported into the
datatracker, that would permit one to run some experiments.  We need that
data, because we need to know if someone is 3/5 qualified already.

    > All of which is why I want to see a specific proposal.  And why I have
    > said that in the abstract I would like to see improvement.

I have written some specific ideas (close to, but not specific wording for
BCP10) on this thread.  If that was insufficient for you to evaluate
conceptually (parameters can be tweaked); can you tell me in what form you
think it needs to be presented?

Or is this really a continuation of the above paragraph; and really you are
saying you'd like to be able apply the process against real data, and observe
the results?  (running code)

-- 
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-