Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> (The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type) to Informational RFC

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Tue, 27 December 2011 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E8321F8586 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwKK6wTyk4fj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA6921F8558 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obcuz6 with SMTP id uz6so7998375obc.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZbJGtsSbTTkcx6/cr0FTHRlF/i92D92hKbYiDFj9ChU=; b=DGEgelW6bLeJMhk7HiVEWvI6OY721ggUmJHzA+l7yI4ej5crRKROvgGzBzHrECswST 7+BK2tHO6PqhLUN3Wuvk9nB+w57FYav92GE/lIr9WtSrVgMWQjB5j+fMNIoZpBaSrCa/ lTy6tZ0BRFi3pKHjktccp41Uxfx/KQFnSmjwc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.227.7 with SMTP id rw7mr24324158obc.70.1324968723645; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.30.167 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:52:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111209175852.12171.32923.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20111209175852.12171.32923.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:52:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CADBvc9-UbeXMtUDLq=KndzMfs6wQxFL4W4gOJBofHO-o8+1ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> (The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type) to Informational RFC
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:52:05 -0000

Hello,

I'd like to seek consensus on separating the semantics of link
relation for separate disclosure and a list thereof, correspondingly
defining two link relations - 'disclosure' and 'disclosure-list'.  You
may see my edits made to Section 2 of the doc. below, which I'm
proposing:

2. 'disclosure' Link Relation Type

   Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI
   [RFC5988] MUST refer to a particular patent disclosure made with
   respect to the material being referenced by context IRI.

3. 'disclosure-list' Link Relation Type

   Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI MUST
   designate a list of patent disclosures made with respect to the
   material being referenced by context IRI.

As the doc. is in Last Call now, in order not to initiate a new one,
please comment on these changes before January 6, so that I could know
which version I should submit for IESG evaluation.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

2011/12/9 The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>rg>:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type'
>  <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> as an Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-01-06. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>   This document specifies the 'disclosure' Link Relation Type.  It
>   designates a list of patent disclosures or a particular patent
>   disclosure itself made with respect to material for which such
>   relation type is specified.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce