Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 26 March 2015 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA011A6EE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0My0-kgDqUo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AA1A1ACE85 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CC0E1AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:20:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 93A6063B76; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:10:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B67A63731 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:10:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
In-Reply-To: <m2egob4yst.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <5513FE6B.7090405@dcrocker.net> <651803AE-97A4-4297-A079-B94A6BD1F104@nominum.com> <m2egob4yst.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:10:26 -0400
Message-ID: <30001.1427382626@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HhC1Y2VMWjnmYip80dqfeNZL9B0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:11:31 -0000
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: >>> So I suggest that providing explicit feedback to all appointees not up >>> for renewal become a regular part of nomcom's deliverables. >> I think this would be a fine plan. > great idea. nomcom needs stuff to fill its copious spare time. I think, knowing Randy, that Randy is being sarcastic, but given the lack of a :-) or something, it's rather hard to say for sure. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Ted Lemon
- RE: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Terry Manderson
- RE: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Michael StJohns
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Randy Bush
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… George Michaelson
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Michael Richardson
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Michael Richardson
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Kathleen Moriarty
- Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to app… Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Bob Hinden
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Ted Lemon
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Ted Lemon
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… t.p.
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Lee Howard
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Michael Richardson
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for rene… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to… Mary Barnes
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to… Livingood, Jason
- Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to… Stephen Farrell