Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu

Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu> Thu, 04 February 2010 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <shore@arsc.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C473A6827 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGVCpiUcv5fE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:18:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arsc.edu (mail1.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:75::229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2339528C1BF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from viking-e0.arsc.edu (viking-e0.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:860:223:32ff:feda:4a52]) by arsc.edu (20090828.ARSC) with ESMTP id o14JIS0A012258; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:18:28 -0900 (AKST)
Message-Id: <77B70CBA-DA30-46D3-AA23-8BD431786F3D@arsc.edu>
From: Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B6B1BAB.9050902@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:18:28 -0900
References: <4B6AE470.3060005@ericsson.com> <4B6AF50C.2050804@gmail.com> <4B6AF875.9080301@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <4B6AF90B.4060904@gmail.com> <4B6B1BAB.9050902@acm.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 2001:480:150:860:223:32ff:feda:4a52
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on IPv6:2001:480:150:75::167
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:18:20 -0000

On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> It is probably true that manually installing xml2rfc is easy in  
> itself - just
> download the new file and unzip it a the right place.  On the other  
> hand, I have
> 2544 different packages installed in my main computer.

!!!

Anyway, I don't need a new version until I need a new version,
and that's when I know I need a new version and I download it.
I don't download it if I don't need a new version.  What I'm
reading here is that people are installing and maintaining
stuff they don't need, which I suppose explains the 2544
packages.  I'd certainly never deny people the ability to
easily maintain unused and unnecessary software and we're
headed *way* off-topic, but I was just struck by how odd it
seemed that somebody who needed the new release of xml2rfc
would be frustrated by it not being in the absolutely,
completely, 100% farkakte ports system.

Melinda