Re: Alternative Proposal for Two-Stage IETF Standardization

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 11 November 2010 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42453A6A32 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:27:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qvE-XBppZ2DB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB84E3A69AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-710a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-710a.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.113.10]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ECCE40BB9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:36:57 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CDBA8F3.5010507@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:27:31 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Alternative Proposal for Two-Stage IETF Standardization
References: <4CD967AD.80605@dcrocker.net> <3486.198.180.150.230.1289445298.squirrel@mail.smetech.net> <4CDB7026.5090903@dcrocker.net> <4CDB918C.8090902@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CDB918C.8090902@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080309010100070601020008"
Cc: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:27:07 -0000

On 11/11/10 2:47 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> Test language: (*)
> 
>      (Full) Internet Standard:
> 
>      The Internet community achieves rough consensus -- on using
>      the multiple, independent implementations of a specification
> 
> and
> 
>      3.3.  [Full] Internet Standard (IS)
> 
>      This is the existing final standards status, based on attainment of
>      significant community acceptance, as demonstrated by use of multiple,
>      independent implementations that conform to the specification.
> 
> (*) This is just from me; it hasn't been vetted with my co-authors.

+1 here.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/