Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Tue, 24 April 2012 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A29921E8042 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.949, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WVDB3GcyBnNk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6EF21E8015 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1nT71j0051ZXKqc51uZZ2A; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:33:33 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([68.83.222.237]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1uZV1j00v57vnMg3huZXv1; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:33:32 +0000
References: <201204241810.q3OIA1cI004757@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <201204241810.q3OIA1cI004757@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-AB4F73BC-F832-4C57-BBE4-42FBF0B6E1F6"
Message-Id: <B37F8BD8-F521-4E69-A05F-81587F8EE057@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B176)
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:33:29 -0400
To: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>
Cc: "john-ietf@jck.com" <john-ietf@jck.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:33:34 -0000

While Wikipedia is sometimes wrong, it does tend to have useful information. Specifically http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Germany

> Publishing or propagating the image does not normally require consent:
> If the person is an irrelevant or merely accidental part (Beiwerk) of a landscape or locality shown in the picture.
> If the person took part in a public meeting or event and is depicted on this occasion.
> If distribution or exhibition serves a higher artistic interest.

http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kunsturhg/__23.html

So - not misled.  

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 24, 2012, at 14:10, Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> wrote:

> Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> 
>> Michael StJohns wrote:
>>> 
>>> Martin - you and everyone else in the room gave permission by being in
>>> the room.  That's what the NOTE WELL is all about.  So no, not illegal. 
>> 
>> Specifically every registered attendee has accepted during the
>> registration process the note-well.
> 
> You're completely misled.
> 
> In Germany (and probably all over Europe) that part of note well
> will not apply to the rights about your own picture/portrait.
> 
> To obtain such a right, a seperate explicit and voluntary consent
> is required.  That is a privilege guaranteed by law.
> 
> -Martin