Re: Request for further input - ART area
Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 04:42 UTC
Return-Path: <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F941B29CA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:42:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A3L2aDacmslT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA091AD364 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0061E28B0041; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:42:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (nova.tislabs.com [10.66.1.77]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D101C1F801E; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 23:42:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:42:12 -0500
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Subject: Re: Request for further input - ART area
In-Reply-To: <2F0B67CE-E16A-43DF-B11D-D6A27DE59422@sobco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1512072332350.22653@tislabs.com>
References: <20151207195722.9040.82406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2F0B67CE-E16A-43DF-B11D-D6A27DE59422@sobco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/I1aI2OzWnZrzV3IvVOjJUdPvmUg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:59:21 -0800
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 04:42:15 -0000
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Scott O. Bradner wrote: > it would help if you included a list of people being considered or a > pointer to such a list Using a datatracker login you can see the list at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2015/feedback/ While you can still submit feedback using that tool, I reiterate Harald's request that you instead send email to nomcom15@ietf.org - that will help us trivially separate out the new input. -- Sam Weiler, Nomcom member
- Re: Request for further input - ART area Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Request for further input - ART area Michael StJohns
- Re: Request for further input - ART area Samuel Weiler
- Re: Request for further input - ART area Randy Bush
- Re: Request for further input - ART area Harald Alvestrand