Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey
Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2024 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD23C151072 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5-hxbjQl6fP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3501AC14F6EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-533462b9428so740952e87.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724175480; x=1724780280; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sV+xTfO3ysqKZEAHF8wgSFwnVOORf0oqLFvT0PsEbUs=; b=WKBTmcycyV7rX+FMvJJbr99QLjOPNZUUQ1ASjvXr+H0+/qTwTn8zka+gRtA+ga8jQg XXxKwM6Rh7KJr3yQhY7BCz7D/cqQfZwFz2OiYEAbAtDHJMmOoPk3aVfKd5HMK1OW0J9h /R3J8DKsXOFPy+onFOPyID75thF9e2T6jhjEolsk0sN2LnUOUuVNEmZx71erXunAecwh LApSqWlRfK8aezv+6zVrz2mQZ9Icf8MAfkNiglDjTl7SElyu9NuTp7YGmcgyBAUz1URr MeI23k1n8UgrL7QLA7eJMjE1SkYXMiYEzlUoaH0IirTKDPFrYQ2x8fkXC+qHYgJXAe+n MC0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724175480; x=1724780280; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sV+xTfO3ysqKZEAHF8wgSFwnVOORf0oqLFvT0PsEbUs=; b=UzyrhJR4X/k8zPZivDzDgv4SfCLFDvblFBSlsLy2n71QgqdGRJy3fN8rX/YpyZUxj6 s0QC7ex3yDiKZ8cvPNKE7XHDQE6BwPmitsF4zJYNNuRf9QAtgbTfMX2eKOVZybPb+eXh 0+nGMrXOfGhex4XhOKJ1yq6SLzK1XO+6ra5hChMUaghN/Ur1V8u4Ch0yfx7qC282MkB2 yxVN/NncUq2Ma5ffqH4CeGKNLRydVFRZNLg97sZJBB7p/D6yj6DeK2GNnfvAYYyUYZVz CzY9lEjDF/sfwZEfENAF/i9Mu0Tf0qTpbt+r3Mz7NNAM1RUBXZzL2851+gs1GryocO/R VaKA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVKuy+5GUXaJhVAdxyhbtrwlC8Eoy2atykl35NZyEOtKZLUzFEFHF1HW1CBAT4iOpPXJnaD@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwkFKLzHVJ4hxlKTF0c33as1z5fvlXMjx6XY2HiUsBrGSBbiv1C u8VDfZg5UIXZiOyjcXzHl4i6LpxzZXDscyyEF2tLQeqNn9yNCqp2+OyZ+vnsYimvJHoWmeinxR0 ks2D63nTx/BIJyb4GMqHhHtWjN1I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IElh27D0w8POJu9btl7z/LtI/xSeij8TyIwm+/5yxSHpiYiFdc8n5mv9GIZ9Bf8Y3B1GHFwvZjNrPeD9GFkJlM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:118e:b0:52c:76ac:329b with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5331c6bdaeemr12500518e87.35.1724175479961; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AC54FD3C-CC33-4EDE-A3EC-B623B91050F5@ietf.org> <7BF7F934-C668-41C6-8BCD-8A1167E83C2C@akamai.com> <1662.1724174353@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1662.1724174353@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:37:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CABmDk8n=V3R2aHGTKqvtEO++YErW5SZ_x_nVDxKK5jStapApzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000385e0062020e36b"
Message-ID-Hash: 4PJOLFSQ4C3Z4MPXQQECWZYWLIBBZFTY
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4PJOLFSQ4C3Z4MPXQQECWZYWLIBBZFTY
X-MailFrom: mary.h.barnes@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/I45xwVKZEbW96Hnt4VMsPms3MQk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
I noticed that folks were using the chairs sitting in the hall for conversations/small side meetings or just as a place to sit to do work or get on a call between sessions. I did the latter and had to wander at times to find such a place. One factor may be that there were a lot of folks staying at other hotels, Airbnbs etc so it’s not really convenient to go back and forth during the day between sessions. So you find a place to park for a bit before the next session. To Rich’s question, when I’ve gone to other conferences (both tech and non-tech) there isn’t extra seating out in the hallways but those are usually much more focused events and single track. Sent from Gmail Mobile On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:22 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > "We continue to bring in extra seating and place it close to the > > breakout rooms, but the feedback shows that we're still > underestimating > > just how much close by seating is needed." > > > That is, the IETF brings in extra seating. I find that amazing. Is > that > > common among other conferences or such? > > I went to a few side meetings in Brisbane, but as it turned out, none in > Vancouver. I guess I didn't notice any extra seating. Are these chairs > in > the hallway that can be brought into the room, or what? > > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > >
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Salz, Rich
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Michael Richardson
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Salz, Rich
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Dean Bogdanovic
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Mary B
- Re: [120all] Results of post-meeting survey Michael Richardson