Re: Random Network Endpoint Technology (RNET)

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Thu, 22 May 2008 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538873A6972; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474B728C186 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAuhPbuNnbIT for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D093A6955 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.103] (cpe-76-185-142-113.tx.res.rr.com [76.185.142.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m4M1K4Ts021029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 May 2008 20:20:06 -0500
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: eburger@standardstrack.com
In-Reply-To: <2011766466-1211406567-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-918969765-@bxe033.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Subject: Re: Random Network Endpoint Technology (RNET)
X-Priority: Normal
References: <BLU120-W192229D53F40915E68DB3FCAC70@phx.gbl> <2011766466-1211406567-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-918969765-@bxe033.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Message-Id: <8562FBC3-C115-4696-83C7-ABE2278CBEB6@softarmor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 20:19:59 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On May 21, 2008, at 4:49 PM, eburger@standardstrack.com wrote:

> So we have reinvented STUN?

No, we've moved the state of STUN into each of the routers between the  
two hosts, and have to hope we don't have a route flap somewhere.

It's sort of like RSVP.

--
Dean
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf