IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx Mon, 21 November 2016 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27A3127076 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:14:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4dwvjG0rcE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sleekfreak.ath.cx (rrcs-67-79-182-226.se.biz.rr.com [67.79.182.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D55112007C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shogunx (helo=localhost) by sleekfreak.ath.cx with local-esmtp (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>) id 1c8uzO-0005uu-Cm; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:14:54 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:14:54 -0500
From: shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
In-Reply-To: <d3adc96d-f549-9c3f-d326-9d128ddc2c8f@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611211512100.13578@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <bb9385fd-42f5-cab5-580d-06d7bcac117d@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.10.1611211437090.13578@sleekfreak.ath.cx> <d3adc96d-f549-9c3f-d326-9d128ddc2c8f@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IAehO755feB2bLj-X5_dh3mHruI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:14:58 -0000


>> In theory, fine.  In practice, you have situations where the police are in 
>> place to protect the corporate revenue of very evil people by brutalizing 
>> the innocent.  See Dakota Access Pipeline for an example.
>> 
>
> If the police are being excessive, then due process needs to be brought to 
> bare on the police, and that is something that the population needs to do 
> though its legal process. However I remain with the point that many innocent 
> and vulnerable people would become victims in the absence of an effective 
> police force, and that the role of the police is to protect such people.

Right, but in the case I cited (and many many more) the police are 
protecting the law breakers, who are drilling without federal permits on 
land that is not theirs.  Right now.  As we speak.  The rightsholders are 
being shot with rubber bullets and sprayed with water in 20 degree 
weather.  This is not the rule of law.

>
> Stewart
>
>
>
>>> 
>>> - Stewart
>>> 
>>> 
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email