Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)

Leif Johansson <> Mon, 19 April 2021 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E313A335B for <>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id daIUPvUlFuel for <>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279DA3A3358 for <>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id j4so16756779lfp.0 for <>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nSIyLExnVnkEyLYxrkdTBQT27nYbqBvEDgl6eZwJlhg=; b=YIF5Nx4yp5PSknWwHmmbkgcftWooEMzahaHVELyjDLzRA5QR49EdzOwBOiiR5+MlEr mYKvk66OtsyCJiW/SJMmr7c3PYr1ISxrm4br7Wq9kxesP99vR5fOdJsSX1QoR5z01JK0 GRVfR4lvYJmKT6luvixJz1UreZD2hKOvS8OCJAEVkK8rrf71p41PjbjwcYQIraUWOiTx xWZQfAWFkTAFTcb4Oi3Nc9RQj/VQfu+k+l+bsXLYtUttomNl9AldYvhBt1HBUUUt/6Cj ExyGrH+7P/xXcINNxpFcNXEFA9MuAlK2IF4DEQ54sR/3B766Wq5uzx7yAhd8Gw0Ce5m8 tJJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nSIyLExnVnkEyLYxrkdTBQT27nYbqBvEDgl6eZwJlhg=; b=DEXHu+RZZWAGf5Vld7PfiZbU47BiVGjejHLCIq3ypScgwhAw1t+d8xVIYE/W/HYH2w K4egYR5vZEsG6GaKjxz9/gz2La0U9A/VBcBrUgxQW2wXMkNy80kQEZ036GVSJrYvX9h4 6ad3dui9DO1jay/HEc00hYQ9LHwCDcFc96CahnM155ZVqeXBMvbdZP+58uHcIYcln9aE SfzJtSaUOXLWXGeMBdnQxEbudrD6f03J4wiLAUn39A+4dRNRrlpSsNyGku7wMchgiVUN xWHqinudag0n8g3T3iy6cMqiPQomdq7clqBTtrE6h+4MDkUFsLvUYKqtjVDRIhOjXafA s1Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532T9o++195sBi3xeL8oyipl0LRdv4AGBV+7PDYsqH+VjDe42glQ FVyw7SN9erQsM1G0PKG0fay5EtLgq4rADg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjNj6kOH5RoUvRZlXzbyP1ki0jVpJmtEbQATWAN4XOW6SM/n1kL61hSQgw57SgV8KXm/WCNQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:13a0:: with SMTP id p32mr12596133lfa.621.1618842311852; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id x4sm1863346ljj.91.2021. for <> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <433863C0CD9449636063CDE3@PSB> <>
From: Leif Johansson <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:25:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:25:21 -0000

>> It really is time we clean up our acts.
> While I do think that we could possibly "clean up our acts" somewhat, I suspect that we will always need some way of pushing back on Bad Ideas and maybe even pushing back on participants who
> persistently promote Bad Ideas.   And that, to a newcomer, such pushing back will be seen as "snarling" or perhaps even worse, no matter how politely the pushing back is done.

Let me contribute a short anecdote.

Years ago I spent some time doing math (never graduated for my sins).

The math department got a slow but steady stream of mail-in "solutions"
to the squaring of the circle.

Anyone with a smattering of higher math knows why this is impossible. For
everyone else claiming you can square the circle is like standing up in
rtgwg and proposing bgp5 should be based on blockchain - or RIP, I don't
know which would be worse.

These mail-in attempts were given to grad students as excercises and *every*
*single* *one* got a polite and detailed answer identifying the problem. They
also got a reference to galois theory of course. Politely.

My point?

It was to politely point out to you that you are wrong.

	Cheers Leif