Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 15 November 2019 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C722120220 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:54:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikC5X8AQdxuJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A437120090 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:54:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1573844082; bh=8BtSROILJ9O8k6e08tYdH7+xjEhVaAxo11b8RtqWHvg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hUeKznYuyXdgIfI6/nnSlNHRr/QO/KQnS83foK/iEnzU8PcyhKsziLhrLxZCNWeXQ f+IoQbiVSZM0fZSX/QQH7BFk5NKdQg45pbXWcVoNeI4Z+jnq8SIT2mPzbhz78xYMSt 3OiLkOX3L8EU9nYtqw2K1yUHPLZIOu/zToFBq5YA=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.153.231]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3KTy-1hmu2a19z0-010IOZ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:54:42 +0100
Subject: Re: Thought experiment [Re: Quality of Directorate reviews]
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com> <91686B28-9583-4A8E-AF8A-E66977B1FE13@gmail.com> <012b9437-4440-915c-f1f9-b85e1b0be768@gmail.com> <8b387d57-f056-7de3-9851-a431b17b67b4@network-heretics.com> <c97440e1-c6bb-8219-2970-357d9c45beb2@gmail.com> <fa406d85-babb-9821-047f-ad7efbdd23f5@network-heretics.com> <11796.1573157656@localhost> <959ECDD1-5DFF-4393-94B8-6425983866D3@akamai.com> <19231.1573175109@localhost>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <b3ee4a4e-feb0-9fda-99ac-a6492374f0e3@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:54:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19231.1573175109@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1PNsRweMPYRvrjMbcql3WaTDEMjYax7Sgav9KwBRtjdFjLYMW71 2gF0S86oTD8wmIBOaBNv4uU8pUAOBHjMiEsopuxf1mfHr32QPat2ZIOR9gFA2l+x6i4dJCh O0dplhJ4qNNa/YE7TrLYeV02erYauLesKtVCR+wA+3DUJDT9AWqimoi6+s9uQnMIEyrZx9g zzJu83yame/n1NkkuAlMA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:pio2blmmNbs=:gCSWCdmxbSYD+oi+3OQdgq Ou95/ohfos08Apxs6suHbWrIJbw9O02UUeiYYWWij15teJlmYIMQp3Lqz8FOoU3HvUr1JpNYc ab9nF/GYZbnPYpHSTlizSKknmO8NR1nE3tV8cLkvOFY8/giXWK/SQhWZD3zuhJ/EE1xe3Y7oO lWOm6hcEp/jVY/xaUvdTTsA8wTnPGUbuLVzjp/YqIvLv+RZGDtIktXBZ/jNrzSg4xNiKjiP3t KSFMWSzWlBCApq63yW/sQIikKDW5GssUkZEHNoWN95SK9Su78QZ9ON11sz35P1UzYuAxXd3Sz KKqx2cCw1tkyr9OHHfT00falELjFptepZd3lKMfZHt60u+H3FIBWuDBKY/HFdP/KhDgv1L665 BpB+qJKe4vLBdZfAzQXUxADhpI1DaDkLyXD7BwM4ITyIWf88oc6mWmZVw79cTf2ps/MpWibD7 63EScOcCwumfLxf29XlBPdyBXhRbhhGloBcx42KcBV3edUcLmvszs1SvsEpfuObwbY/RkS/YP 9RjIZ91cF9b8vaPmuuSuTjtkZXcQJ1OnabZkfadGkeW0OHRNGQGbI5fwOjpqiMXQA/STzVHqy RDED3FbNCDTk5cQW+K2WE5CIfr0Hl89KRY++TddAf4SImNH0tOND/aai3Sz+HcFgHW2RnwNfq 7UggQgVOjtanK7MpnRUIA1OKZ0e/BItUn9heEX49ILiegbv0LTwlyRyWTbpkaElemZMOElQER vMaXaupRqm/GvtgsqmejmwBH9MVUKqcAYovuqy9VpyJmWWEpUqQLvBPfO5YFdeeNBZVsri3hA mqAcgq2Zt9hL6/VS8mxW+uNtq0Iyj5zW+R3bfa/7xzr8VTXuWn5P+rRZt+qYf/mRQoreJtIH3 7X9jg6z6NB2BuBvoKJvXtmkSztany4xOO/z7rOk2fLv04LOwBiCnKnnyLEOKM9ebhzziDqlUe XnLj9ujE2yf0h6L9T6huSAwgeB3f2G8V0wyTZ/xyeQYpWqmw8zuXEabo8AfqLhLN7GF5xxiyz yalI8K06lYFpRmieD2ojQilwF9yNt+J0KxriUZ3A7CLUUvzaZZWm7bhNpLOkmPBz/cCMocXb3 pY8lsA9LaeOR7+steXXAksQ4UiHwhFFACHXOpJUVfVLW39snzErp/Hvda59FiBcG8/uKreYUY W4YjotM1/Suh7G+0tuc3hF2/p/icGj5Ms95NiLqT6bfnI2hI6JGqDQM40ehIuUJ7NWU8tHS5m /hLQTqzfdFJYOIzng5VI/j2Cswjak64rsmhC0gpRaidAt1q//fH19Fce2JMY=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IE76eEuzJn3n87hcL76WkscL9sg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 18:54:58 -0000

On 08.11.2019 02:05, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:
>      >> My impression from the regular plenary reports on attendance my impression is
>      > that the number of people involved in the IETF is declining, yet the number
>      > of RFCs being processed is going up.
>
>      > Attendance is perhaps declining, but I don't recall any discussion of
>      > WG email traffic, for example.
>
> So the number we need to know is what is the trend for RFCs being processed
> by a set of authors who are exclusively remote.
> ...

Why exclusively?

Best regards, Julian