Re: Concerns about Singapore

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu> Fri, 08 April 2016 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@bgp.nu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C77612D703 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlPQnHiR_C6E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgp.nu (bgp.nu [147.28.0.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8935112D6DB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssubron-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net (unknown [66.129.241.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bgp.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C3466CF34; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:45:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@bgp.nu>
In-Reply-To: <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:45:14 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1070A34B-E88B-4BF3-95D0-15B6BF26A704@bgp.nu>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604072157240.31096@uplift.swm.pp.se> <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IOAMC2rq38bNv_XW4YbsvQo9A1o>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:14:12 -0700
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 01:45:27 -0000

On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>; wrote:
> Yes, and speaking of myself, I am prepared, to a reasonable degree, to adjust my behaviour to those laws (and cultural habits as well).

It's wonderful for you if you are always able to do so. Not everyone has that luxury. I don't think I can say this better, so I'll just quote:

On Apr 7, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>; wrote:
> The legal environments of the various countries we consider for venues
> obviously must be a general consideration for our selection criteria.  For
> most considerations, these are "here are thing you do not do - they are not
> legal".
> 
> For this particular issue, the consideration is whether the people themselves
> are the thing that is illegal.

--John