Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F55D21F84CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2t9F5lgg9nb5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987EE21F850F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so2245091pbc.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=15EeObd5RAeiePtgVaMXbqsF2eaveFe8GFVkaQUhAG0=; b=03I3L7dAqaL88bTAH5CCc1PTykR5kWHAV+nwNyYVj6GAA4CAVu69BRyB97I/f/BI0+ 4R8jcyRYcQb7WDxl1QFDRdZeDgI110AJ2tIQFEjhYG7q/FzCjx0fBaS/3wHfLc/V40c9 MyZz56+XSQXmjupcQzUdnJqqTuXFfn2Nh4BFX+p6ZntkdMFII71Anx3YFNw8BNKtg+FS mpEx6lHF4WBIvU9V6/pxCuU/Q4wCUsZPpB9rhb0s/+b6i8e9qj04e6LNgy5GA6Me0FUP 6OSf3pGHDd0hf6E68J9xL7F/Odx+yZ54KlBZIGTK7G3CukEFIKk9+JhCpbdkuELGoyEW 5Oiw==
Received: by 10.68.129.194 with SMTP id ny2mr21892907pbb.56.1336668740408; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from polypro.local (66-230-101-239-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.101.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q1sm9982108pbp.62.2012.05.10.09.52.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 May 2012 09:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FABF241.3040801@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:52:17 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
References: <201205101304.q4AD4LCv013256@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <201205101304.q4AD4LCv013256@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:52:22 -0000

On 5/10/12 5:04 AM, Martin Rex wrote:
> Peter Sylvester wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 11:17 AM, David Morris wrote:
>>> I object to the quantum change in ease of access and persistence of the
>>> information. I see way too much aggregation of personal information and
>>> don't think open-ness is justification for increasing that potential.
>> +1
> +1

I disagree rather strongly.  This is an open standards body with an open
process, and I think if we're going to change that it needs to be as a
result of a more general discussion rather than simply chipping away
around the edges.

Melinda