Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com> Thu, 13 November 2008 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DEF3A68B8; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9BD3A68B8 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20fA48+oEHMO for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A473A6807 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=hardie@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1226610025; x=1258146025; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to: from:subject:cc:content-type:x-ironport-av; z=MIME-Version:=201.0|Message-ID:=20<p06240606c54244ea76a6 @[10.227.68.106]>|In-Reply-To:=20<p06240605c54237e869f2@[ 10.227.68.106]>|References:=20<Pine.LNX.4.33.081112194245 0.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com>=0D=0A=20<20081113112302.3 8928.qmail@simone.iecc.com>=0D=0A=20<e0c581530811130740g1 db5cbfehbcdad361660bf48b@mail.gmail.com>=0D=0A=20<491C533 9.8090801@dcrocker.net>=20<20081113163833.GN76118@shinkur o.com>=0D=0A=20<491C699B.4000702@nortel.com>=20<200811131 80841.GO76118@shinkuro.com>=0D=0A=20<491C711C.3030605@lei si.net>=20<20081113183919.GR76118@shinkuro.com>=0D=0A=20< p06240603c542266a5094@[10.227.68.106]>=0D=0A=20<alpine.LS U.2.00.0811131922190.14367@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>=0D=0A =20<p06240605c54237e869f2@[10.227.68.106]>|Date:=20Thu, =2013=20Nov=202008=2012:58:58=20-0800|To:=20Tony=20Finch =20<dot@dotat.at>|From:=20Ted=20Hardie=20<hardie@qualcomm .com>|Subject:=20Re:=20Context=20specific=20semantics=20w as=20Re:=20uncooperative=20DNSBLs,=20was=20=0D=0A=20sever al=20messages|CC:=20"ietf@ietf.org"=20<ietf@ietf.org> |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii" |X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5300,2777,5433"=3B=20 a=3D"12865155"; bh=IE41lhoAdWl/IwQYKd0E/I8hoaVkYiQMv+7sIger3r0=; b=TdNeSGzqWbr1Nadz3v2rSOYnFpfwRlmqTzcjRtuswxJxKAFHzow5OUqA AaiF4TsidGrBdDr6XRFIn5daZRMyfPSdn3fzVLh3cs2eRKFFVppIExppK R86qvvBIISMBAiKYXFStc7fUNt8hbf/t0o14NPOuqmOYUJtTzHm7S+TM0 E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5433"; a="12865155"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO ithilien.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Nov 2008 13:00:25 -0800
Received: from msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (msgtransport01.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.148]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id mADL0P4i026132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:25 -0800
Received: from nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.93.98]) by msgtransport01.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id mADL0JO2032585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:00:24 -0800
Received: from nasanexmsp01.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) by nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:58:40 -0800
Received: from [10.227.68.106] (10.46.82.6) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:58:40 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <p06240606c54244ea76a6@[10.227.68.106]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240605c54237e869f2@[10.227.68.106]>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0811121942450.12067-100000@egate.xpasc.com> <20081113112302.38928.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <e0c581530811130740g1db5cbfehbcdad361660bf48b@mail.gmail.com> <491C5339.8090801@dcrocker.net> <20081113163833.GN76118@shinkuro.com> <491C699B.4000702@nortel.com> <20081113180841.GO76118@shinkuro.com> <491C711C.3030605@leisi.net> <20081113183919.GR76118@shinkuro.com> <p06240603c542266a5094@[10.227.68.106]> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0811131922190.14367@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <p06240605c54237e869f2@[10.227.68.106]>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:58:58 -0800
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
At 12:08 PM -0800 11/13/08, Ted Hardie wrote: > The other A records have >a specific meaning in which the data returned indicates that indicates something about >its reputation in a specific context (what reputation etc. being context specific). One >of these things is not like the other. Using the same record type for both creates >a need to generate some other context that enables you to figure out what was really meant. I see that my brain didn't get this down to my fingers as I intended (or should as I "indicated"). Please read Andrew's note on this same topic but with the subject line "Clarifying harm to DNS" instead. He's more cogent, the originator of the comment, and he and Olafur still have my support that their point needs to be addressed. Thanks, Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: several messages der Mouse
- Re: several messages David Morris
- Re: several messages Dean Anderson
- Re: several messages Randy Presuhn
- Re: several messages David Morris
- Re: several messages Matthias Leisi
- Re: several messages Steve Linford
- Re: several messages Peter Dambier
- Re: several messages Steve Linford
- Re: several messages Keith Moore
- Re: several messages der Mouse
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: several messages Mark Andrews
- Re: several messages der Mouse
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: several messages David Romerstein
- Re: several messages Randy Presuhn
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: several messages David Romerstein
- Re: several messages David Romerstein
- Re: several messages Keith Moore
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: several messages Al Iverson
- More anti-spam (was: Re: several messages) John C Klensin
- RE: several messages michael.dillon
- Re: several messages Matthias Leisi
- Re: several messages Mark Andrews
- Re: several messages David Morris
- Re: several messages Al Iverson
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages John Levine
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Jim Hill
- Re: several messages John C Klensin
- Re: several messages Al Iverson
- RE: several messages Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Matthias Leisi
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Al Iverson
- RE: several messages Anthony Purcell
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Dave CROCKER
- Re: several messages der Mouse
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Andrew Sullivan
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages David Romerstein
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Jim Hill
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages John C Klensin
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Dave CROCKER
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Tony Finch
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Andrew Sullivan
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages John C Klensin
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Matthias Leisi
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Al Iverson
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Andrew Sullivan
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages John C Klensin
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Ted Hardie
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Matthias Leisi
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Ted Hardie
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Tony Finch
- Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative … Ted Hardie
- Clarifying harm to DNS (was: uncooperative DNSBLs… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Ted Hardie
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Steve Linford
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Peter Dambier
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages David Romerstein
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Peter Dambier
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Keith Moore
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Chris Lewis
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… michael.dillon
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Steve Linford
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… michael.dillon
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Tony Finch
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… John Levine
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Hardie, Ted
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Tony Finch
- Re: several messages Rich Kulawiec
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages Rich Kulawiec
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Al Iverson
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Ted Hardie
- RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Ted Hardie
- Re: several messages John C Klensin
- Re: several messages Al Iverson
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… John L
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… michael.dillon
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Al Iverson
- RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… michael.dillon
- Re: several messages John C Klensin
- Re: several messages Chris Lewis
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Keith Moore
- Re: several messages Al Iverson
- RE: several messages michael.dillon
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Al Iverson
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Ted Hardie
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Douglas Otis
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Theodore Tso
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… Theodore Tso
- Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (wa… Chris Lewis
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was… John Levine
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was… Chris Lewis
- Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperat… John L
- Detecting and disabling bad DNSBLs Peter Dambier
- Re: Detecting and disabling bad DNSBLs Steve Linford
- Re: several messages Pekka Savola
- Re: more bad ideas, was uncooperative DNSBLs, was… Keith Moore
- Re: several messages Rich Kulawiec
- Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meet… YAO
- RE: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: several messages Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: several messages John C Klensin