Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B194A11E80E1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XoYpusHOYn-b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD94E11E80E4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-08-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7387D8A035 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:08:44 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20130820160844.GE21439@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20130819225810.63086.qmail@joyce.lan> <5FF26B6A-7A6C-45FE-BF93-8EB17851159D@virtualized.org> <m2siy56j0s.wl%randy@psg.com> <5212FCEF.80701@dcrocker.net> <55459829-933F-4157-893A-F90552D4441A@frobbit.se> <5213174D.7080504@dcrocker.net> <20130820144646.GE20618@mx1.yitter.info> <5213911A.6010301@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5213911A.6010301@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:08:53 -0000

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:54:02AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:

> In other words, the specific technical limitations being noted are
> unfortunate but (so far) not serious.

You should explain that to my employer's support department.

In any case, I don't think this topic is directly relevant to the
SPFBIS discussion, so I'll not comment on it further.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com