Re: IETF and open source license compatibility

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 12 February 2009 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374E83A6AC3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:19:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vB03PiaPm8Gu for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:19:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wes.hardakers.net (dcn236-43.dcn.davis.ca.us [168.150.236.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9E93A68F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:19:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (wlap.dyn.hardakers.net [127.0.0.1]) by wes.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B5739A47C; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:19:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Subject: Re: IETF and open source license compatibility
Organization: Sparta
References: <87bpt9ou7d.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <C5B8BAE5.30347%stewe@stewe.org> <87k57vlwfu.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <49941899.5010506@piuha.net> <sd4oyzcrh3.fsf@wes.hardakers.net> <877i3vjrkk.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:19:44 -0800
In-Reply-To: <877i3vjrkk.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:03:39 +0100")
Message-ID: <sdd4dnbbf3.fsf@wes.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux, no MULE)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:06:50 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:19:39 -0000

>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:03:39 +0100, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> said:

SJ> The IETF Trust sub-license third parties rights to code components in
SJ> (new) IETF documents under the BSD license, see section 4 of:

SJ> http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy.pdf

Thanks!

Does anyone else feel that the IETF likes to document things in ways
that reflect a maze of twisty passages?  We're very good at making many
rooms (all 5686 of them) but not so good at marking the passageways
between them.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.