Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 16 May 2018 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2901243F6; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jx0se6PW7b-6; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281FB126D74; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l22-v6so1798297otj.0; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WdXYZs8fVQywnKY9Hshw7Fkos7VXIyFDi6hMPoY5FJ4=; b=BWTEO8DUBADPvmK5j44QIltytcfOcIoZf/sw0s07x4csKdyyXtA5Jwdl/UfKYuLMXO 3KnJ1YIzTAbLxxf8iR+/2ZXEjhvpTotaLBviliN1tbVhF/Ni3BJpzLe6stuN9LZQpkS/ WDJggjB1WPN+L0R55E+LZxsaTkkzNQ9V3zrPCDrDW6u29sR+vvbTFcvxfdXAeKCm4/Ab fd8Sa/KwlSP2ppAB9NbOJJWuml8R4Ph43Jhp0sQ/9TMZvCNkPmkf2hCJHRujgreWAq34 3txSfSK0N+DAaMsWAvWRYumR0eSqbiq4T9q/nYLz3AiYXY0D26xhTVqKWmbSVwZI1OjC wWUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WdXYZs8fVQywnKY9Hshw7Fkos7VXIyFDi6hMPoY5FJ4=; b=AP5fcSCNkdgLQ24aRRyIJkvTr/eVh1UHowDWAeR9rCvximGA6V+Q9C2Au6e5QmykL2 kg9FDu1nVN5fiO9MZ6YQ3v+pXwUVHJH0cUDIE2DklZc0qW37ikoYKOtrriSgkOAT734t 0sT2XVkPeTQtqIHfPG7bb5uKPghsgVWv/vGofDC0baBT68/82InuuL6zyRwb/ZW+Ih8X kLpM61s2pHlVVNuHes9Rqc/dTy05ilrHQAcgSy6IDF8AepVU9UUC2FqePLmuWx5SjM3z R9axSipBGwV9gjS5XGO54Nqs0KjZuOcxRmFF0/9pYDbbKTzdCD3j2fUrBgwl+KU7sJna Elpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdsLig+iCHhXeinVd3qZmLtTeZopuCAXt1oG3JaYFh+3Kxs9x+3 mhjcA2BMXCloQ23smMhMuOtsh706OS04EiCJ+uQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqHjUSDA2xgp9FQYN3G4deHFf/bJOtO4lXitD99E/hiJRrD0c8XsEI10oRGGHcNLajgmGJslCi+X41YX6Rb5j8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1811:: with SMTP id b17-v6mr1324646ote.393.1526490779181; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.67.153 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22>
References: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBJZC4zJW0i=wzHECgPot=wjxQeVHi1NDfhCsTvicgeOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a56930056c55d48d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IcaEkKcHdXjIhxhwnyIqq8O4vLc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:13:02 -0000

Howdy,

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:49 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

>
> One of my concerns, which parallels your
> comments, is that the more Hackathons and convention-like
> activities (including tutorials, time for essentially
> unconstrained informal gatherings, exhibition areas, etc.), come
> to be considered and seen as important in
> laying out the schedule, the more likely we will see evaluations
> and decisions shift as to who gets support for attendance at
> IETF meetings and how much work people have to do to justify
> that support.


One of the difficulties with English is that it sometimes hard to tell
whether a conjunction is meant to gather things into a set or distinguish
them from each other.  In your comment above you say "Hackathons and
convention-like activities".  I'm hoping that in this case you meant to
distinguish them from each other.

Hackathons are, at least in my opinion, about as far from convention-like
exhibitions as you can get while sharing the same hotel food.  We are
hosting them in part because we want to see decisions shift on who gets
support for attendance, so that folks who are writing the code that
implements and informs our specifications get to come.  We don't want to do
that to disfavor any current attendee, of course, but to broaden the base
of participation in a way that is particularly useful to producing good
standards.

I hope you concur with that goal.

regards,

Ted Hardie