Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 16 May 2018 17:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2901243F6;
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id jx0se6PW7b-6; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281FB126D74;
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l22-v6so1798297otj.0;
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=WdXYZs8fVQywnKY9Hshw7Fkos7VXIyFDi6hMPoY5FJ4=;
b=BWTEO8DUBADPvmK5j44QIltytcfOcIoZf/sw0s07x4csKdyyXtA5Jwdl/UfKYuLMXO
3KnJ1YIzTAbLxxf8iR+/2ZXEjhvpTotaLBviliN1tbVhF/Ni3BJpzLe6stuN9LZQpkS/
WDJggjB1WPN+L0R55E+LZxsaTkkzNQ9V3zrPCDrDW6u29sR+vvbTFcvxfdXAeKCm4/Ab
fd8Sa/KwlSP2ppAB9NbOJJWuml8R4Ph43Jhp0sQ/9TMZvCNkPmkf2hCJHRujgreWAq34
3txSfSK0N+DAaMsWAvWRYumR0eSqbiq4T9q/nYLz3AiYXY0D26xhTVqKWmbSVwZI1OjC
wWUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=WdXYZs8fVQywnKY9Hshw7Fkos7VXIyFDi6hMPoY5FJ4=;
b=AP5fcSCNkdgLQ24aRRyIJkvTr/eVh1UHowDWAeR9rCvximGA6V+Q9C2Au6e5QmykL2
kg9FDu1nVN5fiO9MZ6YQ3v+pXwUVHJH0cUDIE2DklZc0qW37ikoYKOtrriSgkOAT734t
0sT2XVkPeTQtqIHfPG7bb5uKPghsgVWv/vGofDC0baBT68/82InuuL6zyRwb/ZW+Ih8X
kLpM61s2pHlVVNuHes9Rqc/dTy05ilrHQAcgSy6IDF8AepVU9UUC2FqePLmuWx5SjM3z
R9axSipBGwV9gjS5XGO54Nqs0KjZuOcxRmFF0/9pYDbbKTzdCD3j2fUrBgwl+KU7sJna
Elpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdsLig+iCHhXeinVd3qZmLtTeZopuCAXt1oG3JaYFh+3Kxs9x+3
mhjcA2BMXCloQ23smMhMuOtsh706OS04EiCJ+uQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqHjUSDA2xgp9FQYN3G4deHFf/bJOtO4lXitD99E/hiJRrD0c8XsEI10oRGGHcNLajgmGJslCi+X41YX6Rb5j8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1811:: with SMTP id
b17-v6mr1324646ote.393.1526490779181;
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.67.153 with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22>
References: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:12:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBJZC4zJW0i=wzHECgPot=wjxQeVHi1NDfhCsTvicgeOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>,
ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a56930056c55d48d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IcaEkKcHdXjIhxhwnyIqq8O4vLc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:13:02 -0000
Howdy, On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:49 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote: > > One of my concerns, which parallels your > comments, is that the more Hackathons and convention-like > activities (including tutorials, time for essentially > unconstrained informal gatherings, exhibition areas, etc.), come > to be considered and seen as important in > laying out the schedule, the more likely we will see evaluations > and decisions shift as to who gets support for attendance at > IETF meetings and how much work people have to do to justify > that support. One of the difficulties with English is that it sometimes hard to tell whether a conjunction is meant to gather things into a set or distinguish them from each other. In your comment above you say "Hackathons and convention-like activities". I'm hoping that in this case you meant to distinguish them from each other. Hackathons are, at least in my opinion, about as far from convention-like exhibitions as you can get while sharing the same hotel food. We are hosting them in part because we want to see decisions shift on who gets support for attendance, so that folks who are writing the code that implements and informs our specifications get to come. We don't want to do that to disfavor any current attendee, of course, but to broaden the base of participation in a way that is particularly useful to producing good standards. I hope you concur with that goal. regards, Ted Hardie
- Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Ban… IETF Chair
- RE: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Linda Dunbar
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Paul Wouters
- RE: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Jared Mauch
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Loa Andersson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Adam Roach
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Adam Roach
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Wes Hardaker
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Michael Richardson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Andrew G. Malis
- RE: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Christer Holmberg
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Michael Richardson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Ted Hardie
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Alissa Cooper
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… George Michaelson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Michael Richardson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Warren Kumari
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… János Farkas
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Michael Richardson
- RE: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Janos Farkas
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Michael Richardson
- Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Daniel Harkins
- 答复: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in… Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept)