RE: make IPR declaration on IETF site but targeted at another SDO?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 07 November 2019 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09683120876 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:18:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gX_DBwh1ahp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E168A120873 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:18:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA7FIUqh017505; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:18:36 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7735E22084; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:18:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86258221BB; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:17:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.96.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA7FHrSw006447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:17:54 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <e8a25961-5ac9-d35e-77dd-bf86f45cd077@gmail.com> <7cfd2569-06d3-8562-6f73-b21d131db6d9@gmail.com> <26C8E34F-4AAC-4CA2-B54D-AD3C57CA03C0@eggert.org> <CAA=duU1E=Q_0LyE6B-A5YXEv=a14UJfEqWkS-jvH6ETT9xzboQ@mail.gmail.com> <89F85067-9655-4784-89C2-46D56FE07177@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <89F85067-9655-4784-89C2-46D56FE07177@akamai.com>
Subject: RE: make IPR declaration on IETF site but targeted at another SDO?
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:17:52 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <08e601d5957e$8700eb60$9502c220$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_08E7_01D5957E.8700EB60"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQF4cAFYITYdRnyAtIWyQgBd4CS0RQEYV4kqAcFcbcMBhE0DxAJgNK7nqAQq07A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.96.25
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25028.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.123-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.123-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25028.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--12.123400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: WMT2WRIkHPPxIbpQ8BhdbPSG/+sPtZVkGbJMFqqIm9wvIIDffuAMV2h/ lsrwJYHDiu/uRpOVBisHlWNpQZcO4ANbVHKTl6TGLIrMljt3advd+v0cJIidHzuwTDpX8ii02hB USVFnHv48++chdv/5WJ7D8rkznA1jlaxA/ohaMll6UYddkosva3Gg2i8sqTTadDwP5ItpCOy56i TVyHHCq8neOErnG+u9r/EwLya77le0CeKFBeer6IEU1kn9F/MZjs/yyyVHGh7Jqq1xSxY7Fuml/ E2CK49bhWQmZZ+uR46behOGCjiLqHYcWUyJqir5RR+qE4iJsIeGUvn89UwyEnu4ox6u4PaGqRZL qCxonKSNKIBh68PaAUFFIgyqPdWn98hoZRVgb5UZS5uxXPxN6cogYxpm9PTbl1O3XymEAd7kakA MW1g/fuLzNWBegCW21WdIO+NJS/kEs/H1wMysplOrNp5VU581+gtHj7OwNO2FR9Hau8GO7n0BNr sHCSBvavaM4pk/w/IAtNP2qWq7M63/rlaIkF6EXzsAERafSIPsW1qpytSHEYVJi7t//lWF+lR+K mj8crb+o1Gd+eolTvWgJ21rFsx3
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IenwKX7VX6xqzy7v6gfKXFk5Nz0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:18:45 -0000

I agree with Rich, here.

 

Participation in each SDO is subject to the IPR rules of that SDO. Individuals or their sponsoring organisations need to follow those rules.

 

Disclosing IPR in one SDO has zero impact on the disclosure of IPR in another SDO.

 

Consult an attorney or read the rules?

 

Adrian

 

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Salz, Rich
Sent: 07 November 2019 15:10
To: Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: make IPR declaration on IETF site but targeted at another SDO?

 

I am much less sympathetic. If the company has a patent, the company needs to figure out how to disclose that.