IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)

David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 April 2008 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D5B3A6A74; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC3228C44E; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3M-GdfAwFTK6; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (mailgw3.ericsson.se [193.180.251.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56463A6EC7; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id A1C032079C; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:10:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3c-ac898bb00000193b-85-480e54592c50
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.122]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 6E24420779; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:10:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:10:49 +0200
Received: from [153.88.48.102] ([153.88.48.102]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:10:48 +0200
From: David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:11:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <20080422161010.94BC15081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNGEGIEMAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net> <20080422210658.102D45081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080422210658.102D45081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804222311.06510.david.partain@ericsson.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2008 21:10:49.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[56AECE50:01C8A4BD]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.06.57 Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Perhaps that's true, but I don't see that that's an argument
> against actually running an open process rather than declaring
> a winner in advance and asking the IETF to ratify it.'

Hi,

There seems to be an underlying argument that we've somehow been doing cloak & 
dagger backroom cigar-smokin' stuff.  That's not true at all, which I hope my 
previous response adequately demonstrated.

Cheers,

David
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email