Appealing WG chair selections [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 13 February 2015 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1DC1A1B1D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyG8h9qxAi8C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 520B61A1B16 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pdjp10 with SMTP id p10so22290364pdj.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ti61FGqm5urAJW5100hoflsIbYxguvRQPngBSNoaJvA=; b=eMSDUQWREQ2ErgdX9uQwi45hbTLqUv862tWCQMrCqiPy35kgq17Gs6HWwSRRIo0m51 RqdkglmzRHUSxUMb4xL82pPW5KD8w3ASz80Rk0gjJra1aM22uu04DP8hlfc+ALDvcRGH gs6S4r7l0852iA8Llj1jRkmaeohSRqiOkQT8Gv0FLF0BD8kNnsieHNZMKGWhc3AAuSyq 3hCmTbGOuLVFeSa46M8zHKA/tqXG+K4Ijsdm8FlDdVBp0uXdF1jv3+dgXsqjC5cUAJCM /dne/3AGyz7Y/ZVIfQf74KYaf2331YVgeUwWbhrvfnf35QUTOIk1XXAuKF8YehPFbfaA Wq5Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.159.67 with SMTP id xa3mr19222319pab.13.1423867986769; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6310:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6310:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm7694983pdm.51.2015.02.13.14.53.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54DE805A.8090705@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:53:14 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: Appealing WG chair selections [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwZatYW2e4Wk6GXB2U26fsCn8BV2qt-07kHBugiq34zrcQ@mail.gmail.com> <6025.1423672358@sandelman.ca> <CAL0qLwYtE618sA99hgXP-5wk+BYdcXLbiZqd_36OreYQ1LB7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <732CCD31-0F13-472F-9825-C5F5D650C41B@vigilsec.com> <2457EE06-4960-40B5-AF10-2EDFBF18B2B6@nominum.com> <7C601AA4-55C4-43FE-B2FE-1D22BD73F166@vigilsec.com> <CAKHUCzyJ62hVyJVVLuL5-nXx_i5VO2cW3LA6R1sdZbDHxoY_Tw@mail.gmail.com> <43ADF7ED-6A42-4097-8FFA-5DA0FC21D07A@vigilsec.com> <CAKHUCzyfB+GhNqmDhrzki4tVn0faMLyt_cqgeHFcQL2b5pkkAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYLuknVuY-n6R18_WxW=67+MaE8MZvWyhrGEhofEXLRwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzwoqKAN27kFgWSgVX80xWu3niN9qxaGakSKs+D+1h4ssA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzwoqKAN27kFgWSgVX80xWu3niN9qxaGakSKs+D+1h4ssA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IlRzUJsa6hUFAWCjMFiTrZ2CM-Y>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:53:15 -0000

On 14/02/2015 09:53, Dave Cridland wrote:
...
> c) I suspect that whichever way we do this, the potential influence of a WG
> Chair increases as a result, and I'm unaware of an appeal action for WG
> Chair selection. This might be my own ignorance, but either way we'll need
> one.

I don't know if it's happened, but the IESG would IMHO be very foolish
to refuse to consider an appeal against WG Chair selection. Any action
by an AD should be appealable in principle, IMHO, even if not explictly
mentioned in RFC 2026 or RFC 2418.

   Brian