Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 24 February 2016 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBDD1A92F8; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljvhnys2_ihP; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85D81A6F39; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l127so58660131iof.3; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=BVdZSFv5rjqXBSxLNdehSJnQKzcqOKAGcpePYqW3e2w=; b=pCaQjqq2AmN1LhE5SC8ltnKY5b2su9k7kqG+H2OSoXaqFQEnsCpCBtWTFRDutDrVYA rURLi/qxJ/kkinshVHxbNtsfvvcInr1WJ/aOVm33gKP+a4bPZG0XST2ZGYxNXscW8osv YbMvJJvyxxt+O9NWggQtqnzjKYo/U9XOlBOaFWllhrxWwq4sdOffhf8WI7b88fl6Hi9j iNfwmQT8JW9DRxEquiMwtqV9BoKK4/y2aLgKgpgkVw94rU7sq9SEW6IIUwAGghPSRtFD bdAgDOkzgIEHQnF4KJsX5ThRBnzwBmXQbKwMZJhdTHAznoKBrtGei2rbc8TdT9BT9b4v +vtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=BVdZSFv5rjqXBSxLNdehSJnQKzcqOKAGcpePYqW3e2w=; b=V0jdRsPGXuutTLcfhza2vVXXXbZfmdPcWjHLanJMDfN2AWCPjrzgCCyxdjQDzgHIpc 7aTNsK87jgySAX7MPqCPV0ssa8+vl/vO5LRHDvB9anpGz7Ns3YKbkF30H6ibHGAsfbZY 4zDCW3rVo1jSquHkCC13HgbfZE/hQb1UqGeBP5M6YaIMfw5ghmOFVfTpQ5hfeVGxq54G EF7sIj/QMcpYnD0UogaSoaHwqtGRcH1m5F3ivznWC/zuIaGnj1jJtugin9ELvbrL8bD2 ta/dTbMoFCZ8RCHfBydTGnfKGpeD0gQezsHvRZhC+7Ixy1Fk8qwDZfWjzH5I3yQoGpRP FCoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSgVJw3fdVSwzNB3xihoJGvxONXkInKhGE0NoXpL/ZDISlZKHBlGvhaXFYe5/eqAyaTR6NpVPf/WLiOEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.51.17.34 with SMTP id gb2mr18289000igd.13.1456340179061; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:19 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.184.195 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160224175935.21103.69618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160224175935.21103.69618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:56:18 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: b8CZBuVDv8ZsxtYTxY_wBPHmx9w
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDpMsFuSMHPvkT2vXngGJkNsWDqL-g1EipcCUNjqa2Ssg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Iopw8udPQwgKIWvoZDLo29l5D50>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:56:22 -0000

The main substantive changes are the fourth board appointment and this
paragraph:

   If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IAB
   appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB will
   make reasonable modifications to the processes embodied in this
   document, without requiring further modification to this document.
   Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement.

While this is certainly expedient, it's quite open-ended, entirely
left up to the judgment of the sitting IAB about what "reasonable
modifications" might mean.  Certainly, with a by-law change that adds
a board appointment, most anyone would consider it reasonable to just
add that appointment with the appropriate periodicity, and it's
reasonable not to have to rev this document for that.

But 3677bis is now basically saying that BCP 77 is now obsolete, that
this version is the last one and is indeed documenting current
practice, and that future changes will be made by IAB decision and not
by revision of BCP 77.

Is that the intent?  If so, maybe it would be better now to simply
make BCP 77 obsolete and shift the whole thing into an IAB statement
at this point.

Barry