Re: Old directions in social media.

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Tue, 05 January 2021 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F483A109B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yk-4XdG61LVX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 964603A1027 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id v67so340350ybi.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:08:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1jEbHsP2QlKcLk69ntNWjHgvgvaxQ94wPPMwYJ6Uv9A=; b=Yq+VEaTYmDgFUf3LYXwYGCGK5w+dDNiliAiOoFghz3GW3EVjwzpIqYTHnKznjUJD5d 7zq0Algx/uAvRYoSNclLvzlAf0zJOza6pr/yZA/HoKvGmxUEO6IiA1wY7QonBO73vV3V m1eKSjR7mNFh0tG7dP2mKhhxalD+ut+PNFqZU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1jEbHsP2QlKcLk69ntNWjHgvgvaxQ94wPPMwYJ6Uv9A=; b=lTOAJEYBIxkfCg/gewnWXrizDOioXBG6AQGZ0LIvhQ+SNRdtFQQ73fKpE2SwptkGTs MU+wNtYXqFfzbVS7O19eeiDxz/I45Eh04V5Ekm1LsKf8ex+EIcsu81k3yzCqCq3WKJfA IJWsPjHGozQB7XpCYgq0L+6E6lPnBYZ73j7TkKTq7mHJOELVgOUDUeiKgR3MDqgxIMm/ WtOqTChqux1RZrr1UeBFgMSyjMCw0gdw8OThQITx4r4Zl4VL3ZmYeHuj77gsG76NAtut PTT5bq7sQwXVwBmedN4dOGj5/9NIN9vilwZG6ruRKB0Vob+Yitp9LQ0vhDYBa4iPgPct bwCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yQwMLwECQtWiB1Doo2FLNmk5ZnWkyV4aQTgXFw9ACvdtizqIw Fw2n2llmo3LyqRkvWI5vEvl7enWhl04fLqRLvnxdQw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtoXMX8fF1/rL3THlWzg3zcC5Adao+YUq2csxSqf+y1vq7wi2MF1JnG7MaKTRrZawrDJ5nQtQJYVKQHHF23Ug=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:df4b:: with SMTP id w72mr863870ybg.130.1609870085716; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:08:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nUU0Km_YtgpWbLF-JVQVUXFYvxBNBYbzaLOXBqQyvvUaA@mail.gmail.com> <5692f00c-1709-624c-cd06-b14df28f73fb@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nUostFKjKU43wk-RG5+8SYgMc8Ag-MWs=UXi7x8YXTaKA@mail.gmail.com> <ddb7bdb9-0c58-ad99-9ecb-c7a894684839@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <ddb7bdb9-0c58-ad99-9ecb-c7a894684839@joelhalpern.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:07:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nVh-CCoBAKNz2t5R5dhvPs=3z3abtPXFaG_qVgCdW5aoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098150c05b82b1621"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Iq5YCRiXV9WhNRbkfcdRFwlKGh0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:08:08 -0000

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:53 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> The other is that a number of people have objected to the requirement
> that it be possible to effectively participate in all WG discussions via
> email.
>

This conceit has never been true. Conversations happen one-on-one, as well
as in person. Not every change a document goes through is discussed on the
mailing list, something that was true even in the pre-GitHub era. Editors
even make changes unilaterally, without telling anyone! (Crazy, right?)

Kyle