Re: Registration open for IETF 114

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Mon, 09 May 2022 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399AC1594A4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5dhmhjEngotf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DBEC157B36 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C9932008C0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:14:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 May 2022 19:14:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1652138062; x=1652224462; bh=wD15ZjhqQjDz1x8A7Fl2pNqbAB6h HDJ3RVi42LELANc=; b=p6BzLaKAzl6Lbm5LCkEw0cwMYZ45Ev5weE3Y5SwGcwkj 22RqDKqQpfml5a07zQQYumKU5ey7W8Mf3ssktrh0uqS/GdcRgX4ivO74yiY45/nY i90ZJm7VNZpx6D5BGC7qbjjfHitJ4H4bwT78j8BHTgwfKZKu/ojAP53rlJ2Sxfpp Lu4IXvhSPA/ROzE6kAGeYkvI/rS8d5Zk5Y9jTST241HSLVkVTY6lR6BzEACRE1U5 cXENv5kJ/3dV+d9s+GOc0Ih0b2w9aoWrNySZ9yfHFhgZmOi723evvspbClKwoRnA z8bxvwG/YLhpsrUFj7Pl/ljUqQmqsARqRM/gZBzApg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:TqB5Ym5Cg_IiaVv4-iFIXxkYUTRqBpwC4u_QM0Da7LPw23CcjJDfgA> <xme:TqB5Yv448Bhx_ysTOcoWDNyGahkWcGZ9_hS6b88hsgxuUIw6v4n8Z47m0DGSJiBcc NWWqIHziCSuhw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:TqB5YlfQBDdqXHoVg_c3P18XS25NsrYK7wybnddE5OkBDZ0XAAiTILGqSQV8IlDDwdrLpVtUWCuQ7YM5btA-tdhSQnAhFJZnS1LL>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrgedtgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekre dttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfedtvdelieejve ekjefhueduheeviefhjeefvdfgudfhfffhudduudefgefgteevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkh dqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TqB5YjJLUodCrrdDADSbwdDgLZV3AqlfUUVTRNhuu0bjY_2N1mFGbw> <xmx:TqB5YqK09HfhwJb6q2-y7ochKm_pN6LmIMKM7VMfYIGLM_BUO-GdkA> <xmx:TqB5YkwRuW932Bg259dh-pv5uRmMAYFpHrpfpBDXIA3nRA6tX6yvkQ> <xmx:TqB5YvVMZEElYzx4Bred1iSz-JWCNnPXo9a_pOhhp_CF9J0zH1OKpw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2022 19:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <efb02083-5e0d-73fa-6403-7cd550dad828@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 19:14:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Subject: Re: Registration open for IETF 114
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20220509215913.236CD3FAEC74@ary.qy>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220509215913.236CD3FAEC74@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IqLbWUjXYU0MT08bU7o0MCZSQx8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 23:14:32 -0000

On 5/9/22 17:59, John Levine wrote:

> Could you give us a specific dollar limit for a reasonable price?
This is going to vary a lot from one person to another, but offhand I'd 
say that $1000/meeting for hotel and entry fee combined (not including 
travel) is a good goal for meetings in North America.   (I didn't say a 
strict limit.)
> Also, what counts as near? The IETF hotel is a block from the suburban
> commuter train station (that's the name of the station) so people
> could commute from anywhere on the SEPTA rail system.

This is also going to vary from one person to another.   For a Vancouver 
meeting I once stayed at a hotel 20 blocks from the conference venue, in 
the winter (uphill both ways :) and considered that a reasonable 
compromise.    But it did mean that I couldn't really leave the IETF 
meeting and go back to my room to take a break.   It's much nicer to be 
closer than that.

> The location also has the advantage of being less-than-plane distance
> for a lot of people in the eastern U.S.

Yes, that's true (even for me, maybe).   But such high hotel costs are 
enough of a barrier to participation that proximity might not matter.

It used to be the case that IETF leadership and administrative folks 
understood the need to facilitate low-cost in-person attendance, and in 
general to have as few barriers to effective participation as possible.  
And sure, one can still participate remotely and even get a fee waiver 
to do that.  But I did say _effective_ participation, and that's much 
more easily done face-to-face.   Especially after two years of global 
pandemic.

Keith