IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns

Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@edelweb.fr> Thu, 15 January 2009 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1483A69F6; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C5A3A69F6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:53:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.64
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.64 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_BAD_ID=2.837]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTbasm5XJokg for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ganymede.on-x.com (ganymede.on-x.com [194.51.68.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8554D3A69C7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vinea.on-x.com (sedna.puteaux.on-x [192.168.10.9]) by ganymede.on-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18135D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [193.51.14.5] ([212.234.46.65]) by vinea.on-x.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2009011518524485:303891 ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:52:44 +0100
Message-ID: <496F755A.3050303@edelweb.fr>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:41:46 +0100
From: Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@edelweb.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fourth Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
References: <20090114161820.BFA4228C1BB@core3.amsl.com> <20090115013244.GA20394@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090115013244.GA20394@redoubt.spodhuis.org>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on vinea/ON-X(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/15/2009 06:52:44 PM, Serialize by Router on vinea/ON-X(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 01/15/2009 06:52:45 PM, Serialize complete at 01/15/2009 06:52:45 PM
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

I had given my +1 a bit early after having seen

     "the techniques
      for sending and receiving authorizations defined in TLS Authorizations
      Extensions (version draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt) do not
      infringe upon RedPhone Security's intellectual property rights"

Anyway, there are 4 points in the IPR claim that may require a license.
The text is difficult to understand just by taking the text of the ID.

The questions raised by others concerning the wording of the 4 points
motivate me to step back.

Peter











_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status