Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)

Khaled Omar <> Mon, 07 November 2016 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62B1129493; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:50:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.187
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LuLJSnhzRitK; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318D41298A1; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:50:39 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=uOOEqSD3Nvg4Gla8FDqNM5SZnynDhWUbEibTWhFn6JQ=; b=oAomWdVpapJJbsmxGYbm1RpkOmjhupVeVrJs1nCnj7TIivUTiauFVnuU9jlkUTGu+i72JczpKDOjBj8Q3kNQs3b8fBo5NyV9KnT33q/ep4Hae/TO7Ok+xfKzhgQI35YrHKCDeYvG30e53ZKw9vvcAM7+1ciONTtOaSQy2EGvaK/1MweuDBicPD6dAhs+eIBT/TSMV53mLQm94huLqlocMpLMkY5J61bqovQ0vsRBo1vwIuRNMNU/EVU4DvGN1vohDsNPY1KnUW+QBIEUAzK+4jgVf6DiYifpJOHjgH2H4GRWXBWqIUlel5JA/alGFKYBlf2spQspR/1a/mH73QAg7g==
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.693.6; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:50:37 +0000
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.693.6 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:50:36 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0707.006; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 19:50:36 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <>
To: Franck Martin <>, Terry Zink <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)
Thread-Topic: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)
Thread-Index: AQHSNVuzHKOfGdWA1UyB+W+yk1I8ZKDH4laAgAFibQCAABOfgIAACFoQGS7fkDP/Oxxk8A==
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:50:36 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <WM!9664810c615567bf070fc649d954183e561aaa67977ebde37433238a98da7930f34ca08db8c430e48500f1e63f6d7622!>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:; UpperCasedChecksum:; SizeAsReceived:3301; Count:39
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [F+ue8aq9s7gY6k5ayNo/1ZmnHGjjkkpG]
x-incomingheadercount: 39
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT176; 7:JfEYP0vFrydjer1xyqI884FiF1VM7/kLNb+51TGds9D1sjveUdZyCbCmmGhldhgZDxl7DgtZr/2SXtknsTQ8KzGgqD3FRSAYwa88W7PnD3fGGYI+WnOf8+N7GxXorwmRwK3WM8T0O5dEdkdLlDMlQPJHueW9dQnLKocxApk8EyJ78wF28pqT0HMBB5xOo4tHuXgu003xagUk+Uhh47m6R2Vutgft0ngtewG5s9NnXoAa9BYLUKbIlU/7M4gsB/GO/l9Me5koXcaGtxyeJ5toax2f3BzBGoPiOEx2emEs+2lQoXKqFLjQEcS5DSqOAvSVP/XcEaQWsZqmSA6mbaQN6Zb79MIVYmRfLSe71SR3/Sc=
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT176;; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c5051c21-1a70-4a92-c67c-08d40747581d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5EUR01HT176;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT176; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT176;
x-forefront-prvs: 0119DC3B5E
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR04MB1449E3C18EA62D14CF1C1B4BBDA70HE1PR04MB1449eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Nov 2016 19:50:36.7800 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT176
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2016 19:50:39.0923 (UTC) FILETIME=[377BA830:01D23930]
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, IETF <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 19:50:50 -0000

Hello everyone,

I would like to make a request for a discussion to my article with the title "Internet Protocol version 10" (IPv10), so we can all participate on how it will be useful for the Internet.

I recommend that all of you to check out this link for some details regarding IPv10 before starting the discussion.

Here is the link:


Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10)<>
Khaled Omar is a Network and Systems Engineer with 8+ years of experience in the implementation of network infrastructure, installation of systems and implementation ...

From: ietf <> on behalf of Franck Martin <>
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 9:41 PM
To: Terry Zink
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)

The EAI WG found it was fine to remove the obligation to have an email address part in the mandatory RFC5322.From header, leaving only the display part to assert the original author.

So it seems that "IETF" is not completely in agreement on how to preserve the original author in emails.

So I think the  example showed by Terry is as good as what is in EAI and this is a matter of taste and UI designs, UI design and functions that usually the IETF avoids to deal with...

From: "Terry Zink" <>
To: "Ted Lemon" <>
Cc:, "IETF" <>
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 2:54:33 PM
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)

If you hit "Reply-All", at least when I use Gmail, it includes both the From: and the Reply-To using the scheme below (I tested it out just now). In Outlook desktop I have to also copy/paste the From: address (mailing list). It's not ideal in Outlook desktop, but I can live with it.

In this email discussion, I hit Reply-All and includes Ted on the To:, and<> and<> on the cc.

From: Ted Lemon []
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 2:23 PM
To: Terry Zink <>
Cc:; IETF <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)

On Nov 4, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Terry Zink <<>> wrote:
And if there were something like this in other headers that retains the original senders:

Sender: dmarc <<>>

I don't think this is quite right-I think the Reply-To needs to include all of the senders or else every reply will be an off-list reply (would cut down on noise, admittedly).   Otherwise this would be a great solution.   But because of the way it interacts with MUAs, I do not think it would work in a way that doesn't violate the principle of least surprise.

dmarc mailing list