Re: Registration details for IETF 108

Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C503A0B29 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 05:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkQEpGtREyCa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 05:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6696D3A0B28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 05:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id u26so6734345wmn.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VFU3PzvGxczWiSakjWnWvU+Y7Kv6DAonoVhUQbrZUFI=; b=f3Ck7MXO9uVG9iLBeG4cOP+M4SzLxCm7Y9l3WldsqDKMJwLFAPoMzoE/gSZbYLTqbm Pqi0LNjSupiD7y49q2ClpA5svBldPVy8UM1rNQIps+TpSZAf6qINPTFgUkk5GBTKnjX0 rjuCazcNGvzxTZcrWnBVgngH7XDffHjKl00O2jOoyvGFH8mMiA7YcXLMutrd4cSi8l1O pp9BkhvD/i+6Y8GNDT9sHFtf1IcHAKLJNMpFXO7U/bxq6IA4nlj511PdNj1xDdBmOBWl /CixHlEapTw8x6D6ciIP1Lo1hOGWMlwNQnnLduEJNmJWJEMhq9snoPbtzlvcqqw4dDAI K+Sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VFU3PzvGxczWiSakjWnWvU+Y7Kv6DAonoVhUQbrZUFI=; b=Nvuf0wBvZgMTXNefaPc607o1zUPyxfJTcHDQmrtE+uptHBwtLuro/XoR1ycnvfzbYJ JVxFN4I+FlZKzxyVtVt/eSJLVXLr+KLCTfTskcskbvmR1NbKzmoQAm0HC1Zuv3mf/Ca0 qPcodyIbd8WoC70NhzoW/xnJkkUHSPwRXrTRuYnx91wdOiU6/vpniMXiEuX+CPLgrNVn V6wRar1+oWRaNgNw80wwg1FCiX4QYO9NFHmD51ADf684OxIIaiISy8cHOpGPb6R5iKox JI/jJEtQprkY+7DOANronb523mXr2qSwOLC0o4Kn65rKStIe7SxQFp+9sKPB23Zh4IzN B61w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dos9Pns2KZFJEdI23Xs7b1bwU7QW8xpKfkIfdSbsrrBvH661M 4AqNRMjhPI5Q0vApUJGBCi90Znl0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYb0Gvi4zxsKR8r1c1u1rsZCF9yZ+ekCIn8qzU7m1gGdNPWmbeAFSHgbrOqKtC75jDA6Xv0A==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a74d:: with SMTP id q74mr3800260wme.177.1591273726188; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (tchowndsl.claranet.co.uk. [212.188.254.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v19sm7069563wml.26.2020.06.04.05.28.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Registration details for IETF 108
From: Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a19c3066-bfa7-ded2-d98f-b5e367645451@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:28:44 +0100
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8BE49F8-6FE8-4470-9314-21F8BFE9768A@gmail.com>
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200531121457.0b249858@elandnews.com> <CABcZeBOzVHaSZa0A3eDz12RwNuCiHtiJL8wqvAhhLPN6YEQOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <3f9a0e50-c01b-01c6-ad52-95f370baeb8d@joelhalpern.com> <B71999A2-3EC6-4649-864F-674BA494B511@gmail.com> <616FD1DE-C25F-44CE-9FA3-CC00943FC98B@cable.comcast.com> <A9DBD8B0-01B3-4C68-91B3-BD1E99E226BA@gmail.com> <70d1493c-4c00-f32e-8996-72d0a8369571@comcast.net> <D3BA93CD3D2D101946F35024@PSB> <9F71F116-D7B2-4ECE-9000-957A0C497404@ietf.org> <01d701d638ca$c096b5e0$41c421a0$@gmail.com> <CABcZeBOLAw_9s-gobFYB=5THu_Q70UmDLn_ZhVXhNRHN_nu_0w@mail.gmail.com> <607b7682-0a75-62b6-fd0e-5e2e1171a68b@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMBEqhn115ToB0SwOGavmXze4DdJdL941J4LeVMRrPngpQ@mail.gmail.com> <e1b804ae-4c2e-fdf3-8804-47820d35facf@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMC8ZWHaCBg=WzwtriVf-3bq=egupVgAH-J7dSqspwLoFw@mail.gmail.com> <a19c3066-bfa7-ded2-d98f-b5e367645451@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IynavlqpCbgkKNjren_a1tJTbkE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 12:28:51 -0000

> On 2 Jun 2020, at 22:25, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> I think this bit is where our disagreement is most clear:
> 
> On 02/06/2020 22:16, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> But somebody has to be the stuckee for the decision on the money side of
>> that, and at the moment it is the LLC. 
> 
> The move from zero to non-zero is not "on the money
> side" as the status-quo involves no fee. (Ignoring
> the exception that will be IETF108.)
> 
> FWIW, this discussion is convincing me more that
> the LLC definitely ought not be setting such policies.

I agree with this, though the IESG may have come to the same conclusion if tasked to consider the matter.

As it stands, WG chairs can presumably schedule interims in place of a slot at IETF 108, if they wish to maximise virtual participation, and avoid clashes with other IETF 108 sessions that may draw important contributors away.

Tim