Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 10 February 2015 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F461A1B6E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:27:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3KJ0Py2_FfR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:27:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB6B1A1B75 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:27:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t1AJQxrl005325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:27:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <54DA5B7E.4010908@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:26:54 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
References: <54D903C0.6050209@gmail.com> <54D91478.4060303@nostrum.com> <54D9398C.8000805@qti.qualcomm.com> <011a01d0451a$94cd67a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <54DA57D6.3080604@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54DA57D6.3080604@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/J0bBBsQkwB1c7oqHIJEtJPlkKE4>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:27:09 -0000
Trimming: On 2/10/15 1:11 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I would quite like to be able to "subscribe" to receive updates on a > specific draft rather than on every draft in the WG. But maybe that is > a feature request too far. If I understand what you're asking, the feature is already present (it was added some time back - the project was called the "community tracker"). Take a look at the "My tracked docs" link in the navbar, and the "Track this document" link on a document's main page. You can also add things to your list using the first column of any search result. If I'm not understanding, please let me know what I missed. RjS
- Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise lev… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… John C Klensin
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Pete Resnick
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Eggert, Lars
- RE: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… t.p.
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Lou Berger
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… t.p.
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Jari Arkko
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dave Crocker
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… George, Wes
- Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise… Robert Sparks