IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)

David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com> Tue, 22 April 2008 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A590328C468; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99C28C35D; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nH1H2i80El3g; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BED728C2C6; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 2533F20074; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:14:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-ad997bb000004ec0-d0-480e551710af
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id B92182005F; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:13:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:13:59 +0200
Received: from [153.88.48.102] ([153.88.48.102]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:13:59 +0200
From: David Partain <david.partain@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:14:17 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <20080422161010.94BC15081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <200804222300.53358.david.partain@ericsson.com> <20080422211401.303175081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080422211401.303175081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804222314.17435.david.partain@ericsson.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2008 21:13:59.0370 (UTC) FILETIME=[C824FAA0:01C8A4BD]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.14.01 Eric Rescorla wrote:
> The sum of all this verbiage is that, precisely as I said, there
> wasn't consensus at the BOF, but that there was some set of rump
> meetings where this compromise was hashed out.

Greetings,

And what will be gained by forcing us to jump through more hoops?  You seem to 
dismiss the consensus because it didn't happen the way you think it should.  
How does it make it less the consensus?

Cheers,

David
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email