Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Willie Gillespie <[e-mail]>]

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:13:47PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>> If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
>>>>> reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
>>>     ^^^^^^^^
>>>>> a hint of merit to your argument.   e.g. an actual email address or
>>>>> URL that uses a single-label domain name.
>>>> zod:~$ ping hk
>>>> PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes
>>>> 64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms
>>> % ping hk.
>>> PING hk (203.119.2.28) 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=265 ms
>>> 64 bytes from www.hkdnr.hk (203.119.2.28): icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=265 ms
>>>
>>> Not very reliably, I think.  :-)
> 
> Sorry, I cut and paste the wrong example.  What I had meant to cut and
> paste:
> 
> 5% ping hk
> PING hk.ibm.com (9.190.250.244) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ...
> 
> 							- Ted

With your hk.ibm.com example, do you have any search lines in your 
/etc/resolv.conf file that would be automatically appending?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf