IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E800321F8464 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LYJuQXyY6s7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7532A21F87A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so1322702pad.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LdLJJqGBN5r5vKZxz0jaCe31zbVlUv8hT31hPhIMMwY=; b=baSnRfB5fqviskhSmcwblWAwlGqVgO1UbiKjqMzHCj0usWe7nCTPD18ZSTeCWRr++p VHDmH4Tqi9425OiVF/1LfmIpKIlHP41XMEMrT107BI+3qB2XBgg+gfvaJywdCZRPc0ut 1qk2e9CdTPCN9EGkfttUwLbz9qlOhgYleaqjo4mVeBe/NT+g+49DH1wIuKGfaBeDh3QD fhy2EEQYn2eGrSlHKCKwMH09gAehGqli/0/k/4ZYx/AD81la5wA4k2FTGdwdk1HOj29m ra/JRMR7Z7MKBOO5fHNTSs1tsL3Hsy8XHSvACGv9X7d9XmJah0T5qQ9hVgVK7rGA2QjD 5PtQ==
Received: by 10.68.209.170 with SMTP id mn10mr23470754pbc.11.1354476080236; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (66-230-86-19-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.86.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id os5sm6702684pbc.15.2012.12.02.11.21.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BBAA2D.70900@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:21:17 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im> <50B696B0.30904@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAC4RtVAG+pKSQMwPyB6GJ7jxJM4hNpU81Yt8he6ZsEMrg_rTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <p0624060ccce0b42ffc47@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <50BB10FF.6090105@gmail.com> <50BB5A69.40107@network-heretics.com> <17CDABC9DDB6E00CE9A36B15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB6B61.4040304@network-heretics.com> <3717C2CC54EB3B1A8E3E8EEA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB6FC8.8040907@network-heretics.com> <50BB8DA8.5070406@joelhalpern.com> <AEDAFA38A99E8B0E926BAC0F@JcK-HP8200.jck. com> <50BB96C4.2080908@network-heretics.com> <50BB98B0.2060100@gmail.com> <50BB9FE6.5000000@network-heretics.com> <50BBA0EA.3070204@gmail.com> <50BBA96F.3080401@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BBA96F.3080401@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:21:21 -0000

On 12/2/12 10:18 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
>> I think you'd end up with 2 days of presentation sessions and the
>> remainder of the meeting given over to presentation sessions.
> In which case the ADs should fire the chairs on the spot.

If that's the solution to the presentation problem, then why not
apply it to chairs who mismanage meetings now, rather than creating
new processes/structures?

Melinda

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status