IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard

Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 08 January 2013 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CAD21F87D5; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:57:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j41HsCgllxhM; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208A921F87D1; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x43so82389wey.37 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=f4Zm3pUIP9ZOlZA5ntLnSiy8H727h7I7Az+pKb5N7v8=; b=ohI1YR3QlHZ84yadzyq45o1K6uX2Zi3BFvUN90nT5yS6R2i7/R6VRhKs9bE/uIQuyW 81t/zXlVqvu+kM2QNSfCQo7iEJ9PQs43iTQ68WFT9fmRv/D+v8h6xfPhOiRiFaJuNxlr dCSQoSexSwFTX00MYCtoU/qav7zJ+zvl1Q+oH1x1qr2ul+NdaobJmcWP3oyIOYRg1QKr /UDpCgsKZ+/1DpDY4cX+YcKn6SPweDybE7mH+Bo9LHHFyXM/AVu4wA/51zxqzYaPHX5U G9Z1PwKURaEEMaTIhCL0aBxHoVk9bGylCK/wc83j6Vw4u4GnZcZ4C94gec9xZ3/5Uq20 k/Jg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.23.37 with SMTP id j5mr99616912wjf.28.1357631875372; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.1.101 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY5VjYrGsh-=r3B6aS3ggAjMfPYg0_pc_StEcOoL=+Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20121211150057.28223.93310.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50cb04b9.86df440a.72fe.1e20SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CABP7RbeNsZ_rBWRjou=VG+hBhUKaOz+y1a0sSChwWiHte9znnQ@mail.gmail.com> <50cb5f3c.694c420a.38fb.39afSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAChr6SxZRc3B_HCbw76kLe2dsRSr43r-gLpfMVnCUfJTrZdTLA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfA33huBFadMeXTTEt=MkjW8-d4DFH7+GLXGurnm9sSRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOXDeqpPE4eNy_qJpDPdPHbCQakG9-hDcNZ3Sj9r4kWedByVzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwtS_=iS-k4mJm1vHjEvvGVzay5jDYeGheqsPZqO-89CQ@mail.gmail.com> <EABB8F51-C3B4-49F5-8672-5C2ABAC7043A@mnot.net> <CAChr6Sx7JdKM91EwJaSZ0Ra_F4FSqkuc3vzTY1LM=F_8sWho+Q@mail.gmail.com> <1357515310.6827.23.camel@polyglot> <CAChr6SyAq=7aQdZn54ihYK+0hDhL--2Oaq0RvehoNFbwKNNShA@mail.gmail.com> <1357608790.27936.223.camel@pbryan-wsl.internal.salesforce.com> <CAL0qLwY5VjYrGsh-=r3B6aS3ggAjMfPYg0_pc_StEcOoL=+Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Syt-FYUMBOPR8wD5wKeZk2r=AK=4_CTOxgWndGUFTB1=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "Paul C. Bryan" <pbryan@anode.ca>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:57:57 -0000

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Then, with my co-chair hat on:
>
> it is not my view after reviewing this
> thread that there's rough consensus to reopen the question.

I agree with this assessment.

- Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email