IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E821F9C34 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AN3ZI6iIDHYq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com (sabertooth02.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E3521F898A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1377183756; x=1408719756; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bwj5NvuCtOoasxK91aUqwi6u3nHFQnCfv9aSd3OG3ao=; b=SFyg3LBk0+s1VW5Gb7yxq+wXGkH/ZOl6dGh977fCbk6pBH1Cne6klxs8 QeH4EBFpUFQxo+RqY+1y4pBp2/RoyWYcg6emBzBc5GqUQy99NnlB5szOa DKoAzsed3+odbsasRY8M0EeTxncVDnTBgt1gq7J+HJpbc3teR+7hfRWCk s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7174"; a="50106935"
Received: from ironmsg02-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.183]) by sabertooth02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2013 08:02:20 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7174"; a="18358622"
Received: from nasanexhc16.na.qualcomm.com ([10.45.158.213]) by ironmsg02-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 Aug 2013 08:02:20 -0700
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) by nasanexhc16.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.158.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:02:19 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:02:19 -0700
Message-ID: <521627FC.5010900@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:02:20 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se> <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com> <E3B3B6B0-F17F-44D0-ACD1-53BDBAC6F2CB@frobbit.se> <5214F97B.2080400@dcrocker.net> <6D6829DE-1242-4877-BB5E-8ECD08D88CB2@frobbit.se> <52150722.1070307@dcrocker.net> <52150DF0.6070800@qti.qualcomm.com> <5215123E.5080203@dcrocker.net> <52151903.4030402@qti.qualcomm.com> <521533DB.4040001@dcrocker.net> <52161EB1.6010506@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAPv4CP-hRRU21-fLNDJaFGSaBoWHwyhoACta+3xSoTiJtOdxkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP-hRRU21-fLNDJaFGSaBoWHwyhoACta+3xSoTiJtOdxkA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:02:49 -0000

OK, direct question; I'll take the (short) time to give a direct answer.

On 8/22/13 9:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
> Pete, I like your position, but I believe "go read the archive" or the 
> equivalent will continue to be a standard response unless someone is 
> responsible for giving a more thorough response. Who do you think that 
> should be?

It would be a bummer if it is entirely left to the AD/consensus caller 
or the chair/shepherd, but unfortunately "the buck stops here", as they 
say. Eventually, it should be everyone's responsibility to help their 
colleagues. But obviously my rose-colored glasses are especially rosy 
today, other evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email