Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

"George, Wes" <> Fri, 06 March 2015 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D011A0052 for <>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.424
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUXwgCTkMwDu for <>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35ED1A0027 for <>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:16:03 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,353,1422939600"; d="scan'208";a="838295582"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 06 Mar 2015 10:04:33 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:16:02 -0500
From: "George, Wes" <>
To: Robert Sparks <>, "Eggert, Lars" <>, Pete Resnick <>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:16:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Thread-Topic: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels
Thread-Index: AdBYIHT23XO5bsyeRNKBuIeJLr5+og==
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:16:05 -0000



Wesley George
Time Warner Cable
Core Network Engineering & Architecture
office: 703-561-2540 | mobile: 703-864-4902

Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail server, I
have no control over it.

On 2/10/15, 9:10 AM, "Robert Sparks" <>; wrote:

>>think we want to explicitly CC the list, so that mail filtering keeps
>If I understand things correctly, the expansion I mentioned in point 5
>of my earlier message accomplishes this part of what you are wanting
>(with To: rather than CC:, and is already deployed. If you are seeing
>mail today where that's not the case, please let me know

Though I hate to resurrect an old thread, this is still broken. I've
gotten 5 or 6 emails that were sent to *only* the .all alias that landed
in my inbox because my mail filters apparently aren't smart enough to look
in all of the ancillary headers to find places where the mailing list
address is invoked. I'll be happy to send you headers/whole message
examples if this is a matter of troubleshooting.

Wes George

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.