IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Things that used to be clear (was Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2333D1202D6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0u7ntG2fprA7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blue.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (blue.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E41F12022E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0B5501F35; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:05:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-11-126.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.11.126]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 792B4501D99; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a96.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:05:17 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Towering-Wide-Eyed: 7805f66c21737da1_1562785517817_1977972771
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1562785517817:3381217570
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1562785517817
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF8E806FA; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=KCoU84ijpwYqdB /L2FXqyU1PjEE=; b=r71LbCGjGesBxkahnR9AWq1C+fm2/zp2kiERg5vw+v3a2b eTvXeRGy9Rk7OFz85ifhprmL7eUXhQSys1wny5l5go4VyIvcivrDCNWy+4/Iz157 kTg7Fp8rXWc8ZlZ2m+HgWExJYT4nBLzeB0CQN3hfizyD7xi+TYDm8b7L47dPA=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 599A9806FC; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:05:08 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a96
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Things that used to be clear (was Re: Evolving Documents (nee "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)
Message-ID: <20190710190507.GI3215@localhost>
References: <20190708233438.GP3508@localhost> <ea0b9894-ae9d-55a9-a082-af7aac5be66a@huitema.net> <944332dc-bb2a-0717-8b9f-254b036fe59f@gmx.de> <m2pnmingsi.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAL02cgTBL7w02sWx4kaqGLQe8bGm4jRMyMY9v7yJw57_Sp=PgA@mail.gmail.com> <013801d53729$708c5710$51a50530$@olddog.co.uk> <CAL02cgQPuvVdO6UXkXYLwvD41+2_pBRwj0MXG=qA1oPt73BFmw@mail.gmail.com> <BN8PR15MB2644AAB9613EB10DA5F080EC97F00@BN8PR15MB2644.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <1f38bc19-0c55-4a4e-9de5-a882d60002df@gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7txTR7x8bB6aU7jWXZC61c7ymVBM8UTC+FwpZgLU_Wgg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7txTR7x8bB6aU7jWXZC61c7ymVBM8UTC+FwpZgLU_Wgg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgeeigddufeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JWg4EF90Y-VSklcPeFH8BaNfIRM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:05:21 -0000

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 02:44:30PM -0400, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Building on Melinda's comments, I recently helped a couple of new authors.
> I pointed them to the XML template and the plug-in to XMLmind.  They
> produced a draft rather quickly with very few questions.  They had not
> worked much with XML, but had enough experience with other format
> languages.  They made use of the plug-in features and used it differently
> than I do.  I switch back to see the XML and fix things.  They were just
> excited to generate a draft in which they felt they were contributing.

Yeah, it does seem lik the XML hate is mostly just that, but that our
use of XML is not really a blocker.  But these are feelings we're
talking about -- all subjective.

Better than talking about the RSE situation though.

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email